CVE-2025-31344
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in openEuler giflib on Linux. This vulnerability is associated with program files gif2rgb.C. This issue affects giflib: through 5.2.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in gif2rgb.C when processing GIF image data for conversion to RGB format. The vulnerability allows memory corruption during the conversion process, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution or denial of service via specially crafted GIF files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if giflib is installedRun 'giflib' version check: on Debian/Ubuntu use 'dpkg -l | grep giflib' or check for presence of 'gif2rgb' binary with 'which gif2rgb' or 'ls -la /usr/bin/gif2rgb'Affected if giflib or gif2rgb binary is found on the system
-
Determine the installed giflib versionRun 'gif2rgb -v' or check package version: 'dpkg -l libgif-dev' on Debian-based systems, 'rpm -qa | grep gif' on RHEL-based systems, or inspect the binary with 'strings /usr/bin/gif2rgb | grep -i version'Affected if Version is present and is below 5.2.2, or version cannot be determined (older unpatched installation)
-
Check if gif2rgb is invoked in your environmentSearch scripts, cron jobs, or applications that call gif2rgb: grep -r 'gif2rgb' /etc /opt /home or review application code that processes GIF filesAffected if gif2rgb is actively used to convert GIF files to RGB format
-
Identify source of GIF files being processedReview logs, file processing pipelines, or user upload mechanisms that feed GIFs to gif2rgb, and determine if they originate from untrusted or external sourcesAffected if GIF files from untrusted or external sources are processed by gif2rgb
You are affected if giflib version is below 5.2.2 AND gif2rgb is used to process GIF files, especially those from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate giflib to version 5.2.2 or later if available, or apply vendor-provided patches. Until a fix is available, restrict processing of untrusted GIF files and validate input file sizes before conversion.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31344 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31344 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data