Bus Reservation SystemApplication · Fabian

CVE-2025-3139

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was found in code-projects Bus Reservation System 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function Login of the component Login Form. The manipulation of the argument Str1 leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Login function of the Login Form component in Bus Reservation System 1.0. The vulnerability is triggered via manipulation of the Str1 argument, which is not properly bounds-checked, potentially allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory on the stack.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and bounds checking on the Str1 parameter in the Login function, replace unsafe string handling functions with safe alternatives (e.g., strncpy, snprintf), and apply modern secure coding practices. If a patched version is available, upgrade immediately.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Bus Reservation SystemApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Fabian Bus Reservation System is deployed
    Search the system for files or directories related to the Bus Reservation System application, or check running web services for this application name
    Affected if The application is found running or installed on the system
  2. Verify the installed version is 1.0
    Check application version information through the software inventory, about page, or version metadata file if available, and compare to the affected version = 1.0
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0
  3. Confirm the Login Form component is present
    Locate the Login Form component or module within the application installation directory or source code
    Affected if The Login Form component exists in the deployment
  4. Check if the Login function handles the Str1 parameter
    Examine the Login function implementation to determine if it processes a parameter named Str1 (look for function signatures, request handlers, or parameter parsing logic)
    Affected if The Login function accepts and processes a Str1 parameter without bounds checking

A system is affected if Fabian Bus Reservation System version 1.0 is installed with the Login Form component that processes a Str1 parameter in its Login function.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and bounds checking on the Str1 parameter in the Login function, replace unsafe string handling functions with safe alternatives (e.g., strncpy, snprintf), and apply modern secure coding practices. If a patched version is available, upgrade immediately.

Fix this in Bus Reservation System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3139 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3139 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data