CVE-2025-31613
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aboobacker. AB Google Map Travel ab-google-map-travel allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AB Google Map Travel : from n/a through <= 4.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the AB Google Map Travel plugin. The plugin lacks anti-CSRF token validation on its forms and state-changing actions, allowing attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended operations (such as modifying map settings or configurations).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installation and activationNavigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and verify AB Google Map Travel is installed and activeAffected if Plugin is installed and active in WordPress
-
Identify installed plugin versionCheck the plugin header in the main plugin file (typically wp-content/plugins/ab-google-map-travel/*.php) for the 'Version' comment, or view the plugin in the WordPress plugin repositoryAffected if Installed version falls within the vulnerable version range (if known) or no version-specific patch has been applied
-
Inspect plugin forms for nonce fieldsOpen the main plugin PHP files and search for form declarations (e.g., '<form') and check if they include wp_nonce_field() or similar nonce creation functionsAffected if Forms lack _wpnonce or _wpnonce field parameters in their HTML output
-
Verify AJAX action nonce validationSearch plugin PHP files for add_action('wp_ajax_') calls and examine if the corresponding handlers call check_ajax_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processingAffected if AJAX handlers process requests without verifying nonce tokens
-
Check state-changing admin actionsReview plugin code for any admin action hooks (admin_post_, wp_ajax_) that modify plugin settings or data and verify if they perform nonce validationAffected if State-changing endpoints accept requests without CSRF token verification
The environment is affected if the AB Google Map Travel plugin is active and its forms or AJAX/state-changing actions lack proper nonce validation to prevent CSRF attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement WordPress nonces on all forms and AJAX actions within the plugin, and validate these nonces on the server side before processing any state-changing requests.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31613 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31613 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data