CVE-2025-31628
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in SlicedInvoices Sliced Invoices sliced-invoices allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Sliced Invoices: from n/a through <= 3.10.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in SlicedInvoices WordPress plugin allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The plugin fails to properly validate user permissions before allowing access to certain functionality, potentially enabling unauthorized users to perform actions reserved for higher-privileged roles.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SlicedInvoices plugin is installedLog into WordPress admin panel and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'SlicedInvoices' in the list of active plugins.Affected if The SlicedInvoices plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation.
-
Check installed plugin versionIn Plugins > Installed Plugins, find SlicedInvoices and note the version number displayed below the plugin name. Compare this version against the vendor's release notes for the patched version.Affected if The installed version is older than the latest version containing the security patch.
-
Inspect WordPress user roles and capabilitiesNavigate to Users > Roles or use a role editor plugin to review capabilities assigned to each role. Look specifically for SlicedInvoices-related capabilities (such as 'manage_sliced_invoices', 'edit_sliced_invoices', or similar) assigned to roles below Administrator.Affected if Any role with privilege level lower than Administrator has been granted SlicedInvoices administrative capabilities.
-
Test access to plugin admin functions with low-privilege userLog in with a low-privilege account (e.g., Subscriber or Contributor) and attempt to access SlicedInvoices admin pages directly via URL or navigation menu. Alternatively, use a browser's developer tools to inspect if admin AJAX endpoints or form submissions return successful responses.Affected if A user without Administrator role can access SlicedInvoices admin functionality or successfully submit requests that should require elevated privileges.
-
Review capability checks in plugin codeIf you have file system access, locate the SlicedInvoices plugin directory (wp-content/plugins/sliced-invoices) and search PHP files for 'current_user_can', 'capability', or 'permission' to see if proper authorization checks exist before sensitive operations.Affected if Sensitive functions lack proper current_user_can() capability checks or use weak permission validation.
A user is affected if the SlicedInvoices plugin is installed with a vulnerable version AND low-privilege users can access administrative functionality they should not be able to reach.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate SlicedInvoices to the latest patched version. If no update is available, implement role-based access control checks at all sensitive endpoints and audit the plugin's capability verification logic.
Latest version of Sliced Invoices plugin (version higher than 3.10.0)
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate the Sliced Invoices plugin
- Check if an update is available for the plugin
- If an update is available, update the plugin to the latest version
- If no update is available through the WordPress admin, manually download the latest version from the WordPress plugin repository or the vendor's website and upload it via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly
- Review user roles and permissions to ensure proper access controls are in place
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31628 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31628 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data