CVE-2025-31644
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen running in Appliance mode, a command injection vulnerability exists in an undisclosed iControl REST and BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) command which may allow an authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges to execute arbitrary system commands. A successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceF5 BIG-IP systems running in Appliance mode contain a command injection vulnerability in an undisclosed iControl REST and tmsh command. An authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges can execute arbitrary system commands by injecting OS commands through this interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed BIG-IP modulesRun 'tmsh list sys module' or check the BIG-IP web console for installed modules under System > Package ManagementAffected if Any of these modules are present: APM, AFM, AFW, AAM, ASM, AVR, or Automation Toolchain
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or view the version in the web console (Main > Overview > Summary)Affected if Version falls within 15.1.0 to 15.1.10.6, 16.1.0 to 16.1.5, or 17.1.0 to 17.1.2.1
-
Verify Appliance mode is enabledRun 'tmsh list sys db ui.appliance-mode' or check the system database setting via 'tmsh list sys db all | grep appliance'Affected if The ui.appliance-mode db variable is set to true
-
Confirm administrator account existenceRun 'tmsh list auth user' to list local users, or check admin role assignments via 'tmsh list auth role all'Affected if Any user with administrator or resource administrator role exists
A user is affected if the BIG-IP version is within the affected ranges AND Appliance mode is enabled AND an administrator-level account is present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.10.716.1.617.1.2.2
Apply F5 vendor patches when available. Restrict administrator access and review iControl REST and tmsh command usage in Appliance mode environments. Consider disabling Appliance mode if not required.
15.1.10.7 or later for 15.1.x; 16.1.6 or later for 16.1.x; 17.1.2.2 or later for 17.1.x
- Identify the current BIG-IP version by running 'tmsh show sys version' or checking the web UI system information page
- Determine which version branch (15.1.x, 16.1.x, or 17.1.x) is currently deployed
- Download the appropriate hotfix or upgrade to a fixed version from F5 Downloads at https://downloads.f5.com/ or through the F5 customer portal at my.f5.com
- Review F5 upgrade documentation and release notes before upgrading: https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K84555000
- Plan maintenance window as upgrades may require system downtime
- Back up the BIG-IP configuration using 'tmsh save sys config' before proceeding
- For high-availability environments, follow F5 HA upgrade procedures to minimize disruption
- Perform the upgrade following F5 installation guidelines for your version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31644 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31644 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data