CVE-2025-31655
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect default permissions for some Intel(R) Battery Life Diagnostic Tool within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIntel Battery Life Diagnostic Tool has incorrect default permissions in Ring 3 (user mode) that can be exploited by an unprivileged authenticated user for local privilege escalation. The vulnerability requires high-complexity attack with active user interaction, enabling the adversary to gain elevated privileges on the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Intel Battery Life Diagnostic Tool is installedCheck for the presence of the Intel Battery Life Diagnostic Tool on the system. Look for the executable (typically named 'BatteryLifeDiagnosticTool.exe' or similar) in common installation paths such as 'C:\Program Files\Intel\Battery Life Diagnostic Tool\' or 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Battery Life Diagnostic Tool\'. Alternatively, search the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for an entry containing 'Intel Battery Life Diagnostic Tool'.Affected if The tool is found installed on the system.
-
Identify the installation directoryLocate the installation folder by right-clicking the executable in Task Manager (if running), checking the shortcut properties, or examining the registry uninstall entry found in the previous step. Note the full path to the installation directory.Affected if An installation directory path is identified.
-
Examine file and folder permissions on the installation directoryRight-click the installation folder, go to Properties > Security tab, and review the permissions. Specifically check what permissions are granted to Users or Authenticated Users groups. Look for Write, Modify, or Full Control permissions granted to non-administrative user accounts.Affected if Users or Authenticated Users have Write, Modify, or Full Control permissions on the installation directory or its executable files.
-
Check for weak ACLs on executable filesWithin the installation folder, examine the permissions on each .exe and .dll file. Use 'icacls <filename>' from an elevated command prompt or check the Effective Access tab in the file Properties to determine what permissions standard users have.Affected if Standard (non-privileged) users have Write or Modify permissions on any executable (.exe) or dynamic-link library (.dll) files in the installation directory.
-
Confirm the tool runs with elevated privilegesRun the Intel Battery Life Diagnostic Tool and observe its process properties in Task Manager. Check if the process runs under a privileged account (such as SYSTEM, LocalSystem, or an administrator account) or if it has 'Run as administrator' enabled.Affected if The diagnostic tool executes with elevated privileges while the installation directory is writable by unprivileged users.
A user is affected if the Intel Battery Life Diagnostic Tool is installed and its installation directory or executables grant Write or Modify permissions to non-privileged users, allowing potential privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patch when available; otherwise, restrict or remove the Intel Battery Life Diagnostic Tool until a fix is deployed, or remediate the incorrect file/registry permissions that enable privilege escalation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31655 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31655 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data