CVE-2025-31693
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows OS Command Injection.This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence): from 0.0.0 before 1.0.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS Command Injection vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) module allows attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server due to improper neutralization of special elements in user input or parameters processed by the module.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Drupal AI module is installedCheck your Drupal site's module directory or use drush pm-list --status=enabled to list enabled modules, looking for 'ai' or 'artificial intelligence' moduleAffected if The AI module is present and enabled in the Drupal installation
-
Identify the installed AI module versionCheck the AI module's info.yml file (modules/contrib/ai/ai.info.yml) or run 'drush pm-list --module=ai' to retrieve the version numberAffected if The installed version is any version prior to 1.0.5 (e.g., 1.0.4, 1.0.3, 1.0.0, or any dev/alpha/beta release below 1.0.5)
-
Confirm the AI module is actively processing user inputReview which AI submodule (e.g., LLM providers, agents, or text processing features) is in use and whether external input can reach AI module functionality through Drupal forms or API endpointsAffected if User-supplied input can be passed to the AI module's processing functions without additional sanitization layers
You are affected if the Drupal AI module is installed and its version is less than 1.0.5, and the module is enabled and accessible to process user-supplied data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.0.5
Upgrade Drupal AI module to version 1.0.5 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
1.0.5
- Backup your Drupal site database and files before making any changes
- Update the Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) module to version 1.0.5 or later using Composer: composer require drupal/ai:^1.0.5 or through the Drupal UI at /admin/modules
- Clear the Drupal cache after updating: drush cr or through admin/config/development/performance
- Verify the module is updated by checking /admin/modules or running composer show drupal/ai
- Test that AI functionality works correctly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31693 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31693 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data