Incorrect Permission AssignmentWeakness · CWE-732

CVE-2025-31702

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability exists in certain Dahua embedded products. Third-party malicious attacker with obtained normal user credentials could exploit the vulnerability to access certain data which are restricted to admin privileges, such as system-sensitive files through specific HTTP request. This may cause tampering with admin password, leading to privilege escalation. Systems with only admin account are not affected.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A vulnerability in certain Dahua embedded products allows an authenticated normal user to access admin-restricted data (including system-sensitive files) through specific HTTP requests, potentially enabling password tampering and privilege escalation. The attacker first needs valid normal-user credentials to exploit this. Systems with only an admin account are unaffected.

MitigationRestrict the number of normal-user accounts and monitor for anomalous HTTP requests targeting admin-restricted resources. Apply vendor firmware patches when released. Consider network segmentation for affected devices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine if normal-user accounts exist on the device
    Log into the device management interface and navigate to the user account management section. Count the number of user accounts and identify whether any are designated as non-admin or 'normal' users. Alternatively, use the device API to query user privilege levels.
    Affected if The device has at least one account with normal-user privileges (not admin). If only admin-level accounts exist, the device is NOT affected.
  2. Check the installed firmware version
    Access the device web interface or use the device API to retrieve the firmware version. Common paths: System > Maintenance > Version, or query the device status endpoint. Compare the version number against any Dahua security advisories for CVE-2025-31702.
    Affected if The firmware version falls within the affected range stated in Dahua security advisories for this CVE, or is otherwise unpatched.
  3. Verify HTTP management interface is enabled
    Confirm that the device HTTP/HTTPS management interface is accessible from the network. Check device network settings to ensure the web interface is enabled and note the listening port.
    Affected if The HTTP management interface is enabled and reachable. The vulnerability is exploited via specific HTTP requests.
  4. Review HTTP access logs for admin-restricted resource access
    Examine device logs for HTTP requests targeting admin-restricted endpoints, particularly those that return system-sensitive files or trigger configuration changes. Look for requests from normal-user sessions accessing paths typically reserved for admin privileges.
    Affected if Logs show HTTP requests from normal-user accounts accessing admin-restricted resources, which may indicate exploitation attempts.

The device is affected if it has at least one normal-user account AND is running a firmware version within the affected range, and the HTTP management interface is enabled and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict the number of normal-user accounts and monitor for anomalous HTTP requests targeting admin-restricted resources. Apply vendor firmware patches when released. Consider network segmentation for affected devices.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31702 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31702 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data