AsakusasatelliteApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2025-31727
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins AsakusaSatellite Plugin 0.1.1 and earlier stores AsakusaSatellite API keys unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins AsakusaSatellite Plugin versions 0.1.1 and earlier stores AsakusaSatellite API keys in plaintext within job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller. This exposes credentials to any user with Item/Extended Read permission or filesystem access to the Jenkins controller, representing a sensitive information disclosure vulnerability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
AsakusasatelliteApplication
<= 0.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify AsakusaSatellite plugin is installedNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed, or use CLI: jenkins-cli.jar or check $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ for asakusasatellite directoryAffected if Plugin is not installed - not affected
-
Check plugin versionLook at the version file in the plugin directory (plugin.properties or MANIFEST.MF), or view version in the Manage Plugins UIAffected if Version is 0.1.1 or earlier - vulnerable version present
-
Identify jobs using AsakusaSatellite configurationSearch job config.xml files for '<asakusasatellite>' or 'AsakusaSatellite' elements: find $JENKINS_HOME/jobs -name config.xml -exec grep -l -i 'asakusa' {} \;Affected if No jobs contain AsakusaSatellite configuration - not affected
-
Inspect for plaintext API keysExamine the config.xml files of jobs using AsakusaSatellite. Look for API key values stored as plaintext XML elements (e.g., <apiKey>...</apiKey>) rather than encrypted <secret> entriesAffected if API keys appear in plaintext within config.xml - definitively affected
Affected if the AsakusaSatellite plugin version 0.1.1 or earlier is installed AND jobs contain plaintext API keys in their config.xml files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to AsakusaSatellite Plugin version 0.2 or later once available, which should implement encrypted storage for API keys. Immediately revoke and regenerate any exposed API keys and restrict access to Jenkins controller filesystem.
Fix this in Asakusasatellite
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,768.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31727 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31727 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data