CVE-2025-31774
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in WebProtect.ai Astra Security Suite getastra allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Astra Security Suite: from n/a through <= 0.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in WebProtect.ai Astra Security Suite allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized access to protected resources or functionality that should require proper authentication and authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Astra Security Suite installationLocate the WebProtect.ai Astra Security Suite in your environment - check for installed plugins, extensions, or integrated security modules by reviewing your web application security stack, CMS plugins, or server configurationsAffected if Astra Security Suite is present in the environment
-
Review access control security level settingsAccess the Astra Security Suite admin dashboard or configuration panel and locate the access control or security level settings. Examine whether security levels are set to enforce proper authorization checks on protected resourcesAffected if Access control security levels are configured to allow bypass or are set too permissively
-
Identify protected endpoints and resourcesCatalog sensitive endpoints in your application that should require authorization (admin panels, user data endpoints, configuration pages, API routes). Document which should be restricted versus publicly accessibleAffected if Protected resources exist that rely on Astra for access control
-
Test authorization enforcement on restricted resourcesAttempt to access protected endpoints without valid authentication credentials or with insufficient privileges. Observe whether the system correctly denies access or allows unauthorized entryAffected if The system allows unauthorized access to resources that should require authentication
-
Verify access control configuration consistencyReview multiple access control rules across different modules or sections of Astra Security Suite. Compare configurations to ensure consistent enforcement of authorization checks throughoutAffected if Inconsistent or misconfigured access control rules are found across the security suite
You are affected if WebProtect.ai Astra Security Suite is installed and access control security levels are misconfigured or fail to enforce proper authorization on protected resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper and consistent authorization validation on all sensitive endpoints and functions, ensuring access control security levels are correctly configured according to the principle of least privilege.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31774 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31774 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data