CVE-2025-31810
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in PickPlugins Question Answer question-answer allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Question Answer: from n/a through <= 1.2.73.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Missing Authorization vulnerability in the PickPlugins Question Answer WordPress plugin allows users to access functionality that should be restricted by Access Control Lists (ACLs). The plugin fails to properly enforce authorization checks on certain functions, potentially allowing unauthenticated or lower-privileged users to perform actions reserved for higher-privileged users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installation and versionNavigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and locate 'PickPlugins Question Answer' in the installed plugins list. Note the installed version from the plugin version column, or inspect the plugin's main PHP file (usually in wp-content/plugins/question-answer/) and read the Version header in the plugin comment block.Affected if The plugin is installed and the installed version is lower than the patched version released after CVE-2025-31810.
-
Identify sensitive plugin functions lacking authorizationInspect the plugin's PHP files in wp-content/plugins/question-answer/ for functions that perform privileged actions (such as creating/editing questions, managing answers, changing user settings, or accessing admin functions). Look for function calls that execute database operations or modify content without current_user_can() or capability checks.Affected if Sensitive functions exist that do not perform capability checks before executing privileged operations.
-
Test plugin endpoints for unauthorized accessUsing a low-privilege user account (subscriber or no role) or unauthenticated state, attempt to access plugin AJAX actions or direct function calls by inspecting the plugin's JavaScript files or form submissions. Look for wp_ajax_ or wp_ajax_nopriv_ hooks that handle sensitive operations.Affected if Plugin endpoints respond successfully to requests from unauthenticated or low-privilege users when they should return a permission error.
-
Review user role and capability enforcementCheck the plugin's role handling code (typically in includes files) to see if it properly validates user capabilities using functions like current_user_can(), check_admin_referer(), or nonce verification before allowing access to restricted features.Affected if The plugin grants access to administrative or privileged functions without verifying the current user's role or capability.
You are affected if the PickPlugins Question Answer plugin is installed and its code contains functions or endpoints that handle sensitive operations without proper authorization checks, allowing lower-privileged or unauthenticated users to access restricted functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to a patched version of the plugin once released. Until then, implement role-based access control checks and capability verification on all sensitive plugin functions, and consider deploying a WAF rule to restrict access to plugin endpoints.
Upgrade to the latest version of the Question Answer plugin (version > 1.2.73) from the WordPress plugin repository
- Log in to your WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find the 'Question Answer' (or 'PickPlugins Question Answer') plugin
- Check the current installed version to confirm it is <= 1.2.73
- Navigate to Plugins > Add New
- Search for 'Question Answer' or 'PickPlugins Question Answer'
- If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version
- Alternatively, download the latest version from the official WordPress plugin repository and upload it manually
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31810 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31810 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data