CVE-2025-31836
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in matthewrubin Review Manager review-manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Review Manager: from n/a through <= 2.5.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Missing Authorization (broken access control) vulnerability in the Review Manager plugin. The application fails to properly enforce authorization checks, allowing attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels to access functionality they should not have permission to use.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Review Manager plugin installationIdentify whether the Review Manager plugin is installed in your environment. This may involve checking plugin directories, CMS plugin lists, or application component manifests depending on your platform.Affected if The plugin is present in the environment
-
Determine installed plugin versionLocate and record the version number of the installed Review Manager plugin. Common methods include checking plugin metadata files, admin UI version displays, or package management records.Affected if You cannot determine the version or the version is older than when the vulnerability was fixed
-
Identify plugin administrative endpointsReview the application's routing configuration or plugin file structure to enumerate all administrative endpoints and actions exposed by the Review Manager plugin.Affected if Unrestricted or publicly accessible administrative endpoints exist that should require authentication or elevated privileges
-
Verify access control configurationExamine the plugin's access control settings, security level configurations, and role-based access control (RBAC) definitions to identify misconfigurations that allow unauthorized access to restricted functionality.Affected if Access control security levels are incorrectly configured allowing users to access functionality outside their intended permission tier
-
Test authorization enforcement on sensitive actionsAttempt to invoke sensitive plugin functions (such as review moderation, user management, or data export) using an account with limited or no privileges to verify proper authorization enforcement.Affected if Low-privilege or unauthenticated users can successfully perform actions that should require elevated permissions
You are affected if the Review Manager plugin is installed and its access control security levels are misconfigured such that users can access functionality beyond their intended permission level.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive actions and endpoints, review and correct the access control security level configurations, and verify that user permissions are correctly enforced before allowing access to restricted functionality.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31836 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31836 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data