Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-31906

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ProfitShare.ro WP Profitshare wp-profitshare allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Profitshare: from n/a through <= 1.4.9.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Profitshare WordPress plugin allows authenticated administrators to be tricked into performing unintended actions that inject malicious JavaScript (Stored XSS). An attacker crafts a malicious link or form that, when clicked by an authenticated admin, causes the admin's browser to submit a request that stores XSS payloads in the plugin's database. When other users view the affected pages, the stored scripts execute.

MitigationImplement CSRF token (nonce) validation for all state-changing operations in the plugin and apply proper input sanitization/output encoding to prevent stored XSS. Upgrade to the latest plugin version if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm WP Profitshare plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'WP Profitshare' or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a profitshare-related folder
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active
  2. Identify installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin, find WP Profitshare in Plugins list and note the version number displayed under the plugin name. Alternatively, check the main plugin file header in /wp-content/plugins/[profitshare-folder]/plugin-name.php for 'Version:' tag
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is unknown/old
  3. Check plugin database for suspicious stored XSS
    Access WordPress database (via phpMyAdmin or CLI) and query plugin tables for XSS patterns. Look for entries containing <script, <img onerror=, javascript:, or other XSS vectors in plugin-specific tables (often named like wp_profitshare_* or similar)
    Affected if Database contains XSS payloads in plugin-related tables that were not intentionally added by administrators
  4. Inspect admin action forms for CSRF tokens
    Navigate to WP Profitshare plugin settings/admin pages in WordPress admin. View page source (right-click > View Page Source) and search for forms submitting to plugin admin actions. Check if each form includes a hidden input with name containing 'nonce' or '_wpnonce'
    Affected if Forms performing state-changing actions lack CSRF nonce fields or the nonce is not validated server-side (requires code review of plugin handler)

User is affected if WP Profitshare plugin is installed and either the version lacks CSRF protection or suspicious XSS payloads exist in the plugin's database tables.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement CSRF token (nonce) validation for all state-changing operations in the plugin and apply proper input sanitization/output encoding to prevent stored XSS. Upgrade to the latest plugin version if available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31906 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31906 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data