Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-31909

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Apptivo Apptivo Business Site CRM apptivo-business-site allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Apptivo Business Site CRM: from n/a through <= 5.3.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Apptivo Business Site CRM allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The application fails to properly enforce authorization checks, potentially allowing unauthenticated or lower-privileged users to access restricted functionality or data. This is a classic Broken Access Control (BAC) vulnerability where the security level configuration is improperly set.

MitigationReview and remediate the access control configuration in Apptivo Business Site CRM to ensure proper authorization checks are enforced for all sensitive operations and resources. Update to version 5.4 or later if available, or apply vendor-provided security configuration guidance.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apptivo Business Site CRM version
    Locate the version information in the application admin panel under 'About' or 'Settings', or check the software release documentation
    Affected if Installed version is earlier than 5.4
  2. Review security level configuration
    Access the admin security settings panel and examine the 'Security Level' or 'Access Control' configuration options
    Affected if Security level is set to a value that permits unauthenticated or low-privilege access to sensitive features
  3. Test unauthorized access to restricted functions
    Attempt to access administrative or privileged functions using a standard user account or without authentication, observing whether access is granted
    Affected if Lower-privileged or unauthenticated users can access functionality intended for higher-privilege roles
  4. Verify authorization enforcement on sensitive resources
    Review application logs or test access to customer data, financial records, or configuration areas with a non-admin account
    Affected if Restricted resources are accessible without proper authorization checks
  5. Check access control audit logs
    Examine the application's security audit logs for any access events that bypassed normal authorization gates
    Affected if Logs show successful access from users lacking required permissions

A user is affected if their Apptivo Business Site CRM version is earlier than 5.4 AND the security level configuration allows unauthorized access to privileged functions or data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review and remediate the access control configuration in Apptivo Business Site CRM to ensure proper authorization checks are enforced for all sensitive operations and resources. Update to version 5.4 or later if available, or apply vendor-provided security configuration guidance.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31909 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31909 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data