CVE-2025-31920
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in AmentoTech WP Guppy wp-guppy allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WP Guppy: from n/a through <= 4.3.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in the WP Guppy WordPress plugin allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input. The vulnerability affects versions up to and including 4.3.3, and can be exploited to extract, modify, or delete database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate WP Guppy plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > WP Guppy and read the version number. Alternatively, check the main plugin file (wp-content/plugins/wp-guppy/wp-guppy.php) for the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block.Affected if Version is 4.3.3 or lower (any version up to and including 4.3.3)
-
Confirm plugin is activeIn WordPress admin, verify WP Guppy shows as 'Active' under the plugin status. SQL injection requires the vulnerable code to be running.Affected if Plugin is active and version is within affected range
-
Compare against affected version rangeCompare your installed version number to the affected range: versions up to and including 4.3.3. If your version is 4.3.3 or lower, the vulnerable code is present.Affected if Installed version ≤ 4.3.3
-
Review access logs for suspicious SQL patternsExamine web server access logs (Apache/Nginx) and WordPress debug logs for unusual SQL keywords (UNION, SELECT, INSERT, DELETE, DROP) in request parameters that may indicate exploitation attempts.Affected if Logs show SQL injection attempts targeting WP Guppy endpoints
You are affected if WP Guppy plugin is installed, active, and running version 4.3.3 or lower, or if logs show SQL injection attempts against the plugin.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade WP Guppy to a version beyond 4.3.3 that contains the security patch, or implement proper input validation and parameterized queries in the affected code paths.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31920 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31920 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data