CVE-2025-31931
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled search path for the Instrumentation and Tracing Technology API (ITT API) software before version 3.25.4 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Instrumentation and Tracing Technology API (ITT API) before version 3.25.4 contains an uncontrolled search path vulnerability allowing DLL hijacking. An authenticated attacker with local access can place a malicious DLL in a search path location, which the vulnerable ITT API application will load, enabling privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate ITT API DLL filesSearch the system for ITT API-related DLL files such as iut.dll, ittapi.dll, iomp5.dll, or libittnotify.dll. Common installation directories include Intel SDK paths, application-specific directories, or system library paths.Affected if Any ITT API DLL is found on the system
-
Determine installed ITT API versionRight-click each located ITT API DLL, select Properties, and view the Details tab to find the File Version. Alternatively, use PowerShell: Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Filter "iut.dll" | ForEach-Object { [System.Diagnostics.FileVersionInfo]::GetVersionInfo($_.FullName) }Affected if The file version is lower than 3.25.4 or the version cannot be determined (older installation)
-
Identify processes using ITT APICheck running processes that load ITT API DLLs by using Process Explorer or running: tasklist /m | findstr -i "iut ittapi"Affected if Any process is actively loading an ITT API DLL version below 3.25.4
-
Assess DLL search path exposureReview the application environment to determine if unprivileged users can write to directories in the DLL search path. Check directories where the ITT-using application runs and any directories in the PATH environment variable.Affected if An authenticated user with local access can place a malicious DLL in a directory that the ITT API application will load from
The environment is affected if ITT API DLLs with version below 3.25.4 are installed and the system allows untrusted users to write to directories in the application DLL search path.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate ITT API software to version 3.25.4 or later to remediate the uncontrolled search path vulnerability.
3.25.4
- Identify all installed Intel ITT API (Instrumentation and Tracing Technology API) applications on the system
- Check the currently installed version of the Intel ITT API software - typically found in program files or via 'Add/Remove Programs' in Control Panel
- Download the latest version of Intel ITT API from the official Intel website or through your organization's software distribution channels
- Ensure the version is 3.25.4 or later before installation
- Close any applications that may be using the ITT API (such as Intel VTune Profiler, Intel Trace Analyzer, or other Intel development tools)
- Install the updated Intel ITT API version 3.25.4 or later
- Verify the installation was successful by checking the installed version matches or exceeds 3.25.4
- Restart any affected applications to ensure they load the updated libraries
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31931 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31931 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data