Dryice IautomateApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2025-31952

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HCL iAutomate is affected by an insufficient session expiration. This allows tokens to remain valid indefinitely unless manually revoked, increasing the risk of unauthorized access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

HCL iAutomate has an insufficient session expiration vulnerability where authentication tokens do not expire automatically. Tokens remain valid indefinitely unless manually revoked, allowing attackers who obtain valid tokens to maintain persistent unauthorized access to the application.

MitigationImplement automatic token expiration with appropriate session timeouts, and ensure tokens are invalidated after a configured period of inactivity or maximum lifetime.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dryice IautomateApplication
Affected:= 6.5.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm installed iAutomate version
    Locate the HCL iAutomate installation directory or check the product version through the administration console or installed programs list. Look for version 6.5.1 specifically.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.5.1 of Hcltech Dryice Iautomate
  2. Inspect authentication token configuration
    Access the iAutomate administration panel or configuration files. Look for settings related to authentication tokens, session tokens, or API keys. Check if there is a token expiration or lifetime setting defined.
    Affected if No token expiration time or lifetime is configured, or the token validity period is set to unlimited or never expires
  3. Review session timeout settings
    Examine the security or session management configuration files within iAutomate. Look for session timeout, idle timeout, or maximum session duration parameters.
    Affected if Session timeouts are disabled, set to zero, or set to an extremely long duration such that tokens effectively never expire
  4. Verify token invalidation mechanisms
    Check if there is a mechanism to manually revoke tokens or if automatic token revocation on logout or inactivity is implemented. Look for token blacklist or revocation list functionality.
    Affected if Tokens remain valid after logout or there is no automatic revocation process based on time or inactivity
  5. Test token persistence
    If you have a valid authentication token, observe whether it continues to work after an extended period of inactivity or after a configured timeout period has passed.
    Affected if The token remains functional indefinitely without any expiration or re-authentication requirement

You are affected if running HCL iAutomate version 6.5.1 and authentication tokens do not have automatic expiration configured, allowing persistent access with any obtained token.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement automatic token expiration with appropriate session timeouts, and ensure tokens are invalidated after a configured period of inactivity or maximum lifetime.

Fix this in Dryice Iautomate Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
27.0 hours of engineering $4,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31952 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31952 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data