CVE-2025-31969
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHCL Unica Platform is impacted by misconfigured Content Security Policy (CSP). These can result in malicious resources getting loaded and browsers may come across certain types of attacks, such as cross-site scripting and clickjacking.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHCL Unica Platform contains misconfigured Content Security Policy (CSP) HTTP headers. CSP is designed to prevent XSS and clickjacking by controlling which resources a browser can load. When improperly configured, attackers can inject malicious scripts or trick users into performing unintended actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 25.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm HCL Unica Platform is runningAccess the web application URL in a browser or use a command-line tool like curl to make an HTTP request to the server (e.g., curl -I https://<unica-host>:<port>) and observe the response headersAffected if The server responds with HTTP headers indicating HCL Unica is running and the response includes CSP headers
-
Identify the installed versionCheck the product version through the Unica admin console, the WAR file manifest, or the installation directory (look for version.info or similar files in the Unica installation path)Affected if The installed version is 25.1.0 or any earlier version within the <=25.1.0 range
-
Inspect CSP HTTP headersCapture HTTP response headers from the Unica web application (using browser DevTools Network tab, curl -I, or a proxy) and locate Content-Security-Policy or Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only headersAffected if CSP headers are present and contain any of the following weak directives: unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval, or wildcard (*) sources for script-src, style-src, or object-src
-
Check for missing or weak CSP directivesExamine the full CSP header value and verify whether essential directives (default-src, script-src, style-src, img-src, connect-src) are missing or set to overly permissive values like 'self' with unsafe-inline/eval, or have no restrictions on external sourcesAffected if The CSP is absent entirely, or allows unrestricted inline scripts (unsafe-inline), or permits loading resources from any source (*)
The environment is affected if HCL Unica Platform version 25.1.0 or lower is running AND the HTTP responses either lack CSP headers or contain misconfigured CSP headers that allow unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval, or wildcard source restrictions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReview and properly configure CSP headers in the web server or application configuration to whitelist only trusted content sources and restrict inline scripts.
HCL Unica Platform 25.1.1 or later (verify exact fixed version on HCL support portal)
- Check HCL Unica Platform product documentation or support.hcl-software.com for the specific patch or hotfix addressing CSP configuration
- Locate the web server or application server configuration where CSP headers are defined for Unica
- Review and properly configure Content-Security-Policy headers to be more restrictive, removing overly permissive directives like 'unsafe-inline' or 'unsafe-eval' if present
- Ensure CSP policies explicitly whitelist only trusted content sources and domains
- Test the CSP configuration in a non-production environment to verify legitimate functionality is not broken
- Deploy the updated configuration or upgrade to the fixed version once available
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31969 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31969 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data