CVE-2025-32062
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe specific flaw exists within the Bluetooth stack developed by Alps Alpine of the Infotainment ECU manufactured by Bosch. The issue results from the lack of proper boundary validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a stack-based buffer overflow when receiving a specific packet on the established upper layer L2CAP channel. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to obtain remote code execution on the Infotainment ECU with root privileges. First identified on Nissan Leaf ZE1 manufactured in 2020.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Alps Alpine Bluetooth stack within Bosch's Infotainment ECU. The flaw results from improper boundary validation of user-supplied data when processing specific packets on an established upper layer L2CAP channel. An attacker with Bluetooth adjacency can exploit this to execute arbitrary code with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Infotainment systemDetermine if the target system is a Bosch Infotainment ECU. Check system documentation, model numbers, or hardware identifiers. On Linux systems, examine /proc/cpuinfo, dmesg, or boot logs for 'Bosch' or 'Infotainment' references.Affected if The system is a Bosch Infotainment ECU using the Alps Alpine Bluetooth stack.
-
Confirm Alps Alpine Bluetooth stack presenceIdentify the Bluetooth stack in use. On Linux, run 'hciconfig -a' or check 'bluetoothctl info'. Examine loaded modules or installed packages for 'alps' or 'alps_alpine' references. Check Bluetooth firmware or driver files in /lib/firmware or /etc/bluetooth/.Affected if The system uses the Alps Alpine Bluetooth stack in a Bosch Infotainment ECU.
-
Verify Bluetooth is enabledRun 'hciconfig' or 'bluetoothctl show' to check if Bluetooth adapters are powered on. Check 'rfkill list' for Bluetooth status. On embedded systems, inspect /sys/class/bluetooth/ for active adapters.Affected if Bluetooth is enabled and an adapter is active, creating a reachable attack surface.
-
Check for active L2CAP connectionsMonitor for L2CAP channels using 'btmon' or 'hcidump'. On Linux, use 'sdptool browse' to enumerate L2CAP services. Check /proc/bluetooth/ or bluetoothctl 'info' output for connected L2CAP channels.Affected if Upper layer L2CAP channels are established, which is required for the vulnerable code path to be triggered.
-
Check Bluetooth stack versionQuery the Bluetooth stack version if available. On Linux, try 'hciconfig -a' for version info, check firmware version via 'btmgmt -i hci0 info', or examine kernel logs with 'dmesg | grep -i bluetooth'. Compare against any vendor-released version information.Affected if The installed Alps Alpine Bluetooth stack version does not include the boundary validation fix for L2CAP channel data.
You are affected if your system is a Bosch Infotainment ECU running the Alps Alpine Bluetooth stack with Bluetooth enabled and active L2CAP channels, and the installed version lacks the boundary validation fix for L2CAP packet processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches for the Infotainment ECU Bluetooth stack; if no patch available, implement proper boundary validation checks on L2CAP channel data before copying to stack buffers, and consider network segmentation of the infotainment system.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing20.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,552.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32062 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data