CVE-2025-32122
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Stylemix uListing ulisting allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects uListing: from n/a through <= 2.2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Stylemix uListing WordPress plugin (versions through 2.2.0). The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands, allowing authenticated or unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL queries and potentially exfiltrate or manipulate database content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the uListing plugin installationCheck the WordPress plugins directory at wp-content/plugins/ulisting/ or look for uListing in the WordPress admin under PluginsAffected if The uListing plugin directory exists on the server or is visible in the WordPress admin plugins list
-
Read the installed uListing versionOpen the main plugin file (usually ulisting.php) in the ulisting plugin directory and locate the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block, or query the WordPress database table wp_options for the option_name 'ulisting_version'Affected if The version read is 2.2.0 or any version lower than 2.2.0 (e.g., 2.1.0, 2.0.5, 1.x)
-
Confirm the plugin is activeIn WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins, verify that uListing is activated; alternatively, query the wp_options table for option_name 'active_plugins' and check if ulisting/ulisting.php is listedAffected if The plugin is activated and running on the WordPress site
-
Check for SQL injection indicatorsReview web server error logs and WordPress debug logs for SQL syntax errors or unusual database query patterns, particularly those containing UNION, SELECT, or time-based sleep() functions in request parametersAffected if Unusual SQL error messages or database query patterns appear in logs referencing uListing functionality
The environment is affected if uListing plugin version 2.2.0 or lower is installed and active on the WordPress site, allowing the blind SQL injection to be exploited via vulnerable input parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade uListing to the latest version beyond 2.2.0 which contains the security patch. If immediate upgrade is not possible, identify and sanitize the vulnerable input parameters or implement parameterized queries in the affected code paths.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32122 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32122 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data