CVE-2025-32124
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in eleopard Behance Portfolio Manager portfolio-manager-powered-by-behance allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Behance Portfolio Manager: from n/a through <= 1.7.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBlind SQL Injection vulnerability in eleopard Behance Portfolio Manager allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands via unsanitized user input. The attack is 'blind' meaning the attacker infers information from application behavior rather than seeing direct database output.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm eleopard Behance Portfolio Manager is installedLocate the application installation directory or check for the product in your web server's document root. Common paths may include /wp-content/plugins/ (if WordPress-based) or a dedicated directory under the web root.Affected if The product is present in your environment
-
Identify the installed versionCheck the plugin/theme header, version file, or README within the product directory for a version number. Compare this to any known affected version ranges.Affected if The version is unknown or falls within an affected range without the fix applied
-
Identify user input entry pointsReview the application source code for parameters that accept user input (GET/POST requests, cookies). Focus on search fields, filters, ID parameters, and any input that interacts with database queries.Affected if User-supplied input reaches database query logic without visible sanitization routines
-
Check for prepared statements or input sanitizationSearch the codebase for use of parameterized queries (prepared statements), ORM usage, or input sanitization functions (sanitize_text_field, htmlspecialchars, mysqli_prepare, PDO prepared statements).Affected if No prepared statements or sanitization functions are found protecting the user input entry points that interact with the database
-
Test the parameter with SQL injection payloads (if authorized)Using a safe, authorized testing methodology, submit SQL injection test payloads (e.g., time-based: SLEEP(5), boolean-based: AND 1=1 vs AND 1=2) to suspected vulnerable parameters and observe application response time or behavior differences.Affected if The application exhibits different behavior based on injected SQL syntax, indicating the input is not properly handled
If eleopard Behance Portfolio Manager is installed and user input can reach database queries without proper prepared statement handling or sanitization, the environment is affected by this blind SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations to properly sanitize user-supplied input before executing SQL commands.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32124 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32124 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data