CVE-2025-32145
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in magepeopleteam WpEvently mage-eventpress allows Object Injection.This issue affects WpEvently: from n/a through <= 4.3.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a PHP Object Injection vulnerability in the WpEvently (mage-eventpress) WordPress plugin. The plugin deserializes untrusted data without proper sanitization, allowing attackers to inject malicious PHP objects. If certain magic methods exist in the application or linked libraries, this could lead to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WpEvently plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for 'WpEvently', 'mage-eventpress', or 'MageEventPress' in the installed plugins listAffected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Identify installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins, click on the plugin details to view the installed version number. Compare this against the version that includes the patch for CVE-2025-32145Affected if The installed version is older than the patched version
-
Search plugin code for vulnerable unserialize callsUsing a file manager or grep search, examine PHP files in the plugin directory (typically wp-content/plugins/mage-eventpress or similar) for calls to unserialize() without prior sanitizationAffected if The plugin code contains unserialize() calls that process input without proper validation
-
Check if user input reaches unserializeTrace the data flow from HTTP request parameters (GET, POST, COOKIE, REQUEST) through the plugin to any unserialize() calls identified in step 3Affected if User-controllable input is passed directly to unserialize()
-
Identify exploitable magic methodsSearch plugin and connected library code for magic methods such as __wakeup, __destruct, __get, __set, __call, __invoke, or __toString that could be chained for RCEAffected if Exploitable magic methods exist in the plugin or its dependencies and can be triggered via the injected object
A user is affected if WpEvently/mage-eventpress is installed, the version is unpatched, the plugin uses unserialize() on external input, and exploitable magic methods are present in the environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataAvoid using unserialize() with untrusted input; replace with safe alternatives like json_decode(). Update to a patched version if available. Audit for presence of exploitable magic methods in the plugin or connected libraries.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32145 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32145 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data