CVE-2025-32206
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in LABCAT Processing Projects processing-projects allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Processing Projects: from n/a through <= 1.0.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLABCAT Processing Projects <= 1.0.2 contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability that allows attackers to upload dangerous file types (including web shells) directly to the web server. This gives attackers the ability to execute arbitrary code on the compromised system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify LABCAT Processing Projects installationLocate the LABCAT Processing Projects application on the system. Check for its installation directory, web root, or container deployment. Look for application files, configuration files, or service processes associated with LABCAT.Affected if LABCAT Processing Projects is found running on the system
-
Determine installed versionCheck the application version by inspecting version files, About pages, headers, or the application's configuration. Common locations include: version manifests, setup/configuration files with version fields, or the application's main interface.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.2 or lower (or if version cannot be determined but the product is present)
-
Locate file upload functionalityIdentify if the web interface includes file upload capabilities. Look for upload forms, file submission endpoints, or API routes that accept file uploads. Check the application's feature set for processing project uploads.Affected if File upload functionality is present and accessible via the web interface or API
-
Check upload validation configurationInspect the application's configuration or source code for file type validation mechanisms. Look for whitelist/blacklist configurations, allowed extensions, content-type checks, or file content validation routines in upload handling code.Affected if No file type validation is configured, or validation relies solely on file extension without content validation
The environment is affected if LABCAT Processing Projects version 1.0.2 or lower is installed with accessible file upload functionality that lacks proper file type validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict file upload functionality to allow only safe, whitelisted file types with proper content-type and extension validation. Store uploaded files outside the web root and validate file contents, not just extensions.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32206 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32206 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data