CVE-2025-32250
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in rollbar Rollbar rollbar allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Rollbar: from n/a through <= 2.7.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Rollbar library allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended actions. The vulnerability exists in versions up to and including 2.7.1, where the library fails to properly validate the origin of requests, enabling attackers to craft malicious requests on behalf of victims.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Rollbar library is in useSearch your codebase and dependency files (package.json, Gemfile, requirements.txt, pom.xml, go.mod, etc.) for 'rollbar' referencesAffected if Rollbar library is present in dependencies
-
Check installed Rollbar versionRun package manager commands to inspect the installed version: npm list rollbar, gem list rollbar, pip show rollbar, or equivalent for your language ecosystemAffected if Installed version is 2.7.1 or lower
-
Determine if Rollbar receives data from client applicationsReview Rollbar configuration files and initialization code to see if Rollbar is configured to accept error reports, webhooks, or AJAX requests from frontend applications or external servicesAffected if Rollbar is configured to accept incoming data from client-side applications or webhooks
-
Inspect if SameSite cookie attributes are setExamine your application's HTTP response headers and session cookie configuration for SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax attributes on cookies used by Rollbar endpointsAffected if SameSite attribute is missing or set to None on cookies related to Rollbar functionality
-
Check for Origin header validationReview application middleware, web server configuration, or Rollbar integration code to verify that Origin or Referer headers are validated before processing Rollbar requestsAffected if No Origin header validation is performed on Rollbar-handling endpoints
Your environment is affected if Rollbar version 2.7.1 or lower is installed AND the application relies on Rollbar to process requests from user-facing endpoints without additional CSRF protections at the application layer.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of Rollbar once available. In the meantime, implement additional CSRF protections at the application layer such as SameSite cookies, Origin header validation, and application-level anti-CSRF tokens for any Rollbar-integrated endpoints.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32250 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data