CVE-2025-32258
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in InfoGiants Simple Website Logo simple-website-logo allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Simple Website Logo: from n/a through <= 1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Simple Website Logo WordPress plugin <= 1.1 has a missing authorization vulnerability allowing attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. This means the plugin fails to properly verify user permissions before allowing access to certain functionality, potentially letting unauthorized users perform actions they shouldn't be able to.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Simple Website Logo plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'simple-website-logo' or 'simple-website-logo-lite', or look for the plugin in the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Determine the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually simple-website-logo.php) and locate the version comment at the top of the file, or check the plugin details in WordPress admin plugins listAffected if The version is 1.1 or lower, or if no version is displayed and the plugin appears unmaintained
-
Inspect plugin PHP files for capability checksExamine the plugin's PHP files (especially AJAX handlers and admin functions) for proper authorization calls such as current_user_can(), check_ajax_referer(), or wp_verify_nonce() before executing sensitive operationsAffected if No capability verification functions are found before actions that should require admin privileges
-
Check AJAX endpoint authorizationSearch the plugin code for add_action('wp_ajax_...') calls and verify that each includes permission verification (current_user_can) or nonce validation before processing requestsAffected if AJAX endpoints can be accessed and executed without authentication or authorization verification
Your environment is affected if the Simple Website Logo plugin is installed with version 1.1 or lower and the plugin code lacks proper capability checks on its AJAX endpoints or admin functions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest version of Simple Website Logo when available, or implement proper capability checks and authorization verification on all plugin functions and AJAX endpoints.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32258 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32258 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data