CVE-2025-32308
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in looks_awesome Team Builder a-team-showcase allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Team Builder: from n/a through <= 1.5.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing authorization vulnerability in the Team Builder (a-team-showcase) plugin allows attackers to bypass access control checks due to incorrectly configured security levels. The vulnerability stems from improper implementation of authorization controls, potentially allowing unauthorized users to access functionality or data that should be restricted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Team Builder plugin installationLocate the Team Builder plugin (a-team-showcase) in your CMS/plugin system and identify its installed version numberAffected if The plugin is installed and the version cannot be determined or is not the latest available version
-
Review user role configurationInspect the user roles and permission levels configured in your system, specifically examining what roles have access to Team Builder plugin functionsAffected if Roles with insufficient or overly permissive access levels exist that should have restricted access
-
Test access to sensitive endpointsAttempt to access Team Builder administrative functions, AJAX endpoints, or data export features using a low-privilege or unauthenticated accountAffected if Access is granted to functionality that should require elevated privileges or authentication
-
Check authorization implementationReview the plugin's code or configuration files for role-based access control (RBAC) checks on sensitive operationsAffected if No authorization checks are found, or checks are improperly configured (e.g., using client-side checks only, or missing capability checks)
-
Audit plugin configuration settingsExamine the plugin's security settings panel for any security level or access control configuration optionsAffected if Security level is set to a value that allows unauthorized access, or no explicit authorization settings are present
Your environment is affected if the Team Builder plugin is installed without proper role-based authorization checks enforced on its sensitive functions and endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Team Builder plugin to the latest version which should include proper authorization checks. If no update is available, implement role-based access control (RBAC) checks at all sensitive endpoints and functions within the plugin.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32308 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32308 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data