Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-32310

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeMove QuickCal - Appointment Booking Calendar for WordPress quickcal allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects QuickCal - Appointment Booking Calendar for WordPress: from n/a through <= 1.0.15.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the QuickCal WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.0.15) allows authenticated attackers to trick administrators into unknowingly performing privileged actions, potentially leading to privilege escalation. The attacker crafts a malicious request and social-engineers a logged-in admin to trigger it, exploiting the absence of proper CSRF token validation in sensitive administrative functions.

MitigationApply any available security update immediately; if no patch exists, disable the plugin until remediation is available. Site administrators should also ensure no unexpected administrative actions appear in audit logs and consider implementing additional request validation at the web application firewall level as a temporary measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify QuickCal plugin is installed
    Check your WordPress plugins directory or navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard to confirm the QuickCal plugin is present and active
    Affected if QuickCal plugin is installed and active on the WordPress site
  2. Identify the installed QuickCal version
    View the plugin details in the WordPress admin (Plugins page) or inspect the plugin header in its main PHP file to retrieve the version number
    Affected if The installed version is any version that lacks CSRF token validation (compare your installed version to the affected ranges)
  3. Inspect plugin forms for CSRF token fields
    Examine the plugin's HTML forms (in the plugin's PHP files under wp-content/plugins/quickcal) and look for nonce fields such as wp_create_nonce(), _wpnonce, or similar token inputs
    Affected if Forms and AJAX endpoints are missing nonce or token fields that would prevent CSRF attacks
  4. Verify nonce verification in request handlers
    Review the plugin's PHP handlers that process administrative actions (look for functions handling save, update, create, or delete operations) and check if they include nonce verification calls such as wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer()
    Affected if Request handlers lack proper nonce verification logic before processing sensitive administrative actions
  5. Confirm lack of authorization checks on sensitive actions
    Analyze the plugin code to determine if sensitive functions (especially those affecting user roles, permissions, or administrative settings) properly validate user capabilities using current_user_can() or similar authorization checks
    Affected if Sensitive administrative actions can be triggered without proper capability checks, allowing privilege escalation

If QuickCal is installed and its sensitive actions lack both CSRF token generation in forms and verification in handlers, the environment is affected by this CSRF vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply any available security update immediately; if no patch exists, disable the plugin until remediation is available. Site administrators should also ensure no unexpected administrative actions appear in audit logs and consider implementing additional request validation at the web application firewall level as a temporary measure.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32310 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32310 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data