Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2025-32377

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Rasa Pro is a framework for building scalable, dynamic conversational AI assistants that integrate large language models (LLMs). A vulnerability has been identified in Rasa Pro where voice connectors in Rasa Pro do not properly implement authentication even when a token is configured in the credentials.yml file. This could allow an attacker to submit voice data to the Rasa Pro assistant from an unauthenticated source. This issue has been patched for audiocodes, audiocodes_stream, and genesys connectors in versions 3.9.20, 3.10.19, 3.11.7 and 3.12.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Voice connectors in Rasa Pro (aicodec, audiocodes_stream, and genesys) fail to enforce authentication even when a token is configured in credentials.yml, allowing unauthenticated attackers to submit voice data directly to the conversational AI assistant.

MitigationUpgrade Rasa Pro to version 3.9.20, 3.10.19, 3.11.7, or 3.12.6 (or later) to patch the authentication bypass in the affected voice connectors.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Rasa Pro version
    Run 'rasa --version' or check the installed Rasa Pro package version via pip list | grep rasa-pro
    Affected if Installed version is earlier than 3.9.20, 3.10.19, 3.11.7, or 3.12.6
  2. Locate credentials.yml
    Find the credentials.yml file in the Rasa Pro deployment, typically in the project root or ./rasa directory
    Affected if File exists and is accessible
  3. Check for affected voice connectors
    Inspect credentials.yml for any of these connector entries: 'aicodec:', 'audiocodes_stream:', or 'genesys:'
    Affected if Any of the three voice connectors (aicodec, audiocodes_stream, genesys) are present in the configuration file
  4. Verify connector is enabled
    Confirm that the connector entry in credentials.yml is not commented out and contains configuration values (not empty)
    Affected if An affected connector is uncommented and configured with values (even if a token is set, the flaw bypasses authentication)

If Rasa Pro version is below the fixed releases AND any of the aicodec, audiocodes_stream, or genesys voice connectors are enabled in credentials.yml, the environment is affected by this authentication bypass vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Rasa Pro to version 3.9.20, 3.10.19, 3.11.7, or 3.12.6 (or later) to patch the authentication bypass in the affected voice connectors.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to Rasa Pro 3.12.6 (or at minimum 3.9.20, 3.10.19, or 3.11.7 depending on compatibility)

  1. Identify current Rasa Pro version by checking the installed package version (e.g., pip show rasa-pro or looking in requirements.txt)
  2. Upgrade to one of the fixed versions: 3.9.20, 3.10.19, 3.11.7, or 3.12.6
  3. Run pip install rasa-pro==<chosen_version> or update requirements.txt with the chosen version
  4. Redeploy the Rasa Pro application with the updated version
  5. Verify that authentication is now properly enforced for audiocodes, audiocodes_stream, and genesys voice connectors
Caveat Review custom configurations in credentials.yml and test voice connector integration after upgrade to ensure compatibility with the patched version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32377 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32377 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data