CVE-2025-32423
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAutoGPT is a workflow automation platform for creating, deploying, and managing continuous artificial intelligence agents. Prior to 0.6.32, there is a DoS vulnerability in ExtractTextInformationBlock. Malicious users can amplify their input. For example, if a malicious user inputs 10K of content, the server will consume 50G of memory, eventually causing memory resources to be exhausted, resulting in DoS. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.6.32.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAutoGPT versions before 0.6.32 contain a memory amplification DoS vulnerability in the ExtractTextInformationBlock function. Attackers can submit relatively small inputs (e.g., 10KB) that cause the server to allocate massive amounts of memory (e.g., 50GB), leading to memory exhaustion and service unavailability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AutoGPT installationLocate the AutoGPT application or service in your environment. Check for processes named 'autogpt', 'AutoGPT', or check installed packages using pip list | grep -i autogpt or similar package manager commands.Affected if AutoGPT is found in your environment and the version is below 0.6.32
-
Determine installed AutoGPT versionRun the version check command for your AutoGPT installation (commonly 'autogpt --version', 'python -m autogpt --version', or check the package version via pip show autogpt). Compare the returned version number to 0.6.32.Affected if The installed version is lower than 0.6.32 (e.g., 0.6.31, 0.6.30, or any earlier version)
-
Verify ExtractTextInformationBlock is in useCheck if your AutoGPT deployment uses the ExtractTextInformationBlock function. This may be visible in logs, configuration files, or by reviewing which plugins or features are enabled. Inspect the codebase or plugin directory for references to 'ExtractTextInformationBlock'.Affected if ExtractTextInformationBlock is present and enabled in your AutoGPT configuration or workflow
-
Monitor memory usage during text extractionWhile AutoGPT is processing text input, monitor server or container memory consumption using system tools (top, htop, docker stats, or similar). Submit a modest-sized text input (around 10KB) and observe if memory spikes dramatically (approaching tens of gigabytes).Affected if Memory consumption spikes disproportionately relative to input size, approaching tens of gigabytes for small inputs
Your environment is affected if AutoGPT version is below 0.6.32 and the ExtractTextInformationBlock function is accessible, causing disproportionate memory allocation under normal text processing workloads.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to AutoGPT 0.6.32 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately possible, implement input size limits and memory consumption controls on the ExtractTextInformationBlock function.
0.6.32
- 1. Identify the currently installed AutoGPT version in your environment
- 2. Upgrade AutoGPT to version 0.6.32 or later to remediate the resource exhaustion vulnerability in ExtractTextInformationBlock
- 3. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the installed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32423 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32423 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data