EladminApplication

CVE-2025-3250

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in elunez eladmin 2.7. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /api/database/testConnect of the component Maintenance Management Module. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A deserialization vulnerability exists in elunez eladmin 2.7 within the Maintenance Management Module's /api/database/testConnect endpoint. Remote attackers can exploit this by sending malicious serialized data to potentially execute arbitrary code.

MitigationApply any available vendor patch for eladmin 2.7. If no patch exists, implement strict input validation on the testConnect endpoint and replace unsafe deserialization with safe alternatives such as JSON or whitelisted object types.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EladminApplication
Affected:= 2.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Eladmin installation
    Locate the Eladmin web application in your environment - typically deployed as a Java WAR or JAR file, often behind a web server like Nginx or Apache. Check running processes or deployed artifacts for 'eladmin' or 'eladmin-2.7' in the file name or process arguments.
    Affected if Eladmin is not present in the environment at all, then not affected.
  2. Verify the exact version number
    Check the application's version identifier - this is typically found in the deployed WAR/JAR file name, in the application's about page, in a configuration file (application.yml or pom.xml within the deployment), or via the /api/system/actuator/info endpoint if exposed.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.7 - only this specific version is affected per the CVE.
  3. Confirm the testConnect endpoint exists
    Check if the /api/database/testConnect endpoint is accessible by attempting a request to it (e.g., GET or POST to http(s)://<host>/api/database/testConnect). Review application routing configuration or web.xml to confirm this endpoint is registered.
    Affected if The endpoint returns a valid HTTP response (even an error) indicating it exists and is reachable.
  4. Verify the Maintenance Management Module is active
    Examine the application's configuration or module list to confirm the 'Maintenance Management Module' is enabled. This may be visible in the admin UI under System Management > Modules, or present in the database tables that store module configurations.
    Affected if The Maintenance Management Module is enabled and the testConnect endpoint is functional.
  5. Check network exposure of the vulnerable endpoint
    Review firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, and access control lists to determine if the /api/database/testConnect endpoint is exposed to untrusted networks or the public internet.
    Affected if The endpoint is accessible from untrusted networks (not limited to localhost or trusted admin IPs).

If Eladmin version 2.7 is running with the Maintenance Management Module enabled and the /api/database/testConnect endpoint is accessible, the environment is affected by this deserialization vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply any available vendor patch for eladmin 2.7. If no patch exists, implement strict input validation on the testConnect endpoint and replace unsafe deserialization with safe alternatives such as JSON or whitelisted object types.

Fix this in Eladmin Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3250 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data