CVE-2025-3250
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in elunez eladmin 2.7. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /api/database/testConnect of the component Maintenance Management Module. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA deserialization vulnerability exists in elunez eladmin 2.7 within the Maintenance Management Module's /api/database/testConnect endpoint. Remote attackers can exploit this by sending malicious serialized data to potentially execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Eladmin installationLocate the Eladmin web application in your environment - typically deployed as a Java WAR or JAR file, often behind a web server like Nginx or Apache. Check running processes or deployed artifacts for 'eladmin' or 'eladmin-2.7' in the file name or process arguments.Affected if Eladmin is not present in the environment at all, then not affected.
-
Verify the exact version numberCheck the application's version identifier - this is typically found in the deployed WAR/JAR file name, in the application's about page, in a configuration file (application.yml or pom.xml within the deployment), or via the /api/system/actuator/info endpoint if exposed.Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.7 - only this specific version is affected per the CVE.
-
Confirm the testConnect endpoint existsCheck if the /api/database/testConnect endpoint is accessible by attempting a request to it (e.g., GET or POST to http(s)://<host>/api/database/testConnect). Review application routing configuration or web.xml to confirm this endpoint is registered.Affected if The endpoint returns a valid HTTP response (even an error) indicating it exists and is reachable.
-
Verify the Maintenance Management Module is activeExamine the application's configuration or module list to confirm the 'Maintenance Management Module' is enabled. This may be visible in the admin UI under System Management > Modules, or present in the database tables that store module configurations.Affected if The Maintenance Management Module is enabled and the testConnect endpoint is functional.
-
Check network exposure of the vulnerable endpointReview firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, and access control lists to determine if the /api/database/testConnect endpoint is exposed to untrusted networks or the public internet.Affected if The endpoint is accessible from untrusted networks (not limited to localhost or trusted admin IPs).
If Eladmin version 2.7 is running with the Maintenance Management Module enabled and the /api/database/testConnect endpoint is accessible, the environment is affected by this deserialization vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply any available vendor patch for eladmin 2.7. If no patch exists, implement strict input validation on the testConnect endpoint and replace unsafe deserialization with safe alternatives such as JSON or whitelisted object types.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3250 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data