CVE-2025-32505
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SCAND MultiMailer scand-multi-mailer allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MultiMailer: from n/a through <= 1.0.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SCAND MultiMailer allows attackers to trick authenticated users into submitting malicious requests that inject stored XSS payloads. The lack of proper CSRF protection on state-changing operations enables the attacker's crafted requests to be processed as legitimate user actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm SCAND MultiMailer installation and versionLocate the SCAND MultiMailer installation directory and identify the version number from application files, typically found in a version info file, header, or admin panel about sectionAffected if The installed version falls within the affected range and the application handles authenticated user sessions
-
Inspect form HTML for anti-CSRF tokensView the source code of state-changing forms (such as user management, settings, or message composition forms) and check if hidden token fields or other CSRF protection mechanisms are presentAffected if Forms lack anti-CSRF token fields and the application processes requests without validating tokens
-
Test Origin and Referer header validationSubmit a state-changing request with a mismatched or missing Origin/Referer header (using a tool like Burp Suite or curl) and observe if the server accepts or rejects the requestAffected if The server processes requests without validating Origin/Referer headers and accepts requests from unauthorized origins
-
Verify session requirement for state-changing actionsAttempt to execute state-changing operations (such as saving settings or modifying data) without an active authenticated session or with an invalid session tokenAffected if The application allows state-changing operations to execute without valid authentication tokens
-
Check for stored XSS sanitization on input fieldsSubmit script-tag payloads in input fields used by state-changing forms and verify if the application sanitizes or encodes output when the data is displayed backAffected if Input fields accept and store unsanitized script content that executes when viewed
A user is affected if SCAND MultiMailer is installed, lacks anti-CSRF tokens on forms, does not validate Origin/Referer headers, and allows stored XSS injection via CSRF-forged requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all forms and state-changing endpoints, validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and ensure stored XSS sanitization is in place to prevent script injection via CSRF-forced requests.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32505 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32505 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data