CVE-2025-32571
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in TuriTop TuriTop Booking System turitop-booking-system allows Object Injection.This issue affects TuriTop Booking System: from n/a through <= 1.0.10.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe TuriTop Booking System contains a deserialization vulnerability (CWE-502) where untrusted data is being deserialized, allowing an attacker to inject malicious PHP objects. This object injection can potentially lead to remote code execution if the application uses vulnerable unserialize() calls or similar unsafe deserialization methods.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm TuriTop Booking System installationSearch for TuriTop-related files or directories on the web server. Common paths may include /var/www/html/, /home/*/public_html/, or the web root. Look for files named 'turityp', 'booking', or a directory containing 'turityp' in the name.Affected if The TuriTop Booking System is present on the server.
-
Identify TuriTop versionCheck for a version file, changelog, or composer.json within the TuriTop installation directory. Common locations include a VERSION file, config.php with version constants, or the source code header comments.Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or matches an unpatched release.
-
Locate unsafe deserialization functionsSearch the TuriTop source code for PHP deserialization functions: grep -r 'unserialize' /path/to/turityp/ and grep -r 'unserialize' /path/to/turityp/. Review each occurrence to determine if it processes user-supplied data.Affected if Code contains unserialize() calls that handle data from HTTP requests, user input, or external sources.
-
Trace deserialized data sourcesFor each unserialize() call found, trace back the data origin. Check if the input comes from $_GET, $_POST, $_COOKIE, $_REQUEST, or database fields that could contain user-controlled serialized payloads.Affected if Deserialized data originates from any untrusted source without prior validation.
A user is affected if the TuriTop Booking System is installed and its codebase contains unserialize() calls that process untrusted input from users or external sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of TuriTop Booking System that addresses this vulnerability. If no patch is available, audit the codebase for unsafe deserialization functions (e.g., unserialize(), pickle, yaml.load) and replace with safer alternatives like json_decode(), or implement strict allowlist validation for deserialized objects.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32571 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32571 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data