CVE-2025-32606
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Deepak Khokhar Listings for Buildium listings-for-buildium allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Listings for Buildium: from n/a through <= 0.1.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Listings for Buildium WordPress plugin (version <= 0.1.5) enables attackers to trick authenticated administrators into unknowingly submitting malicious requests that result in stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, allowing injection of malicious scripts that persist in the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Listings for Buildium plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Listings for Buildium', or check for the plugin directory at wp-content/plugins/listings-for-buildium/Affected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Determine the installed versionIn WordPress admin plugins list, note the version displayed for 'Listings for Buildium', or open the main plugin PHP file (such as listings-for-buildium.php) and locate the 'Version' field in the plugin header commentAffected if The version is 0.1.5 or lower (versions at or below this number are affected)
-
Inspect plugin for missing CSRF protectionsExamine the plugin source code files, particularly form handlers and AJAX endpoints. Search for wp_nonce_field, wp_nonce_url, or check_admin_referer function calls. Determine if these nonce verification functions are present and properly validated before processing any state-changing requestsAffected if Forms, AJAX endpoints, or admin actions lack nonce validation or do not verify the nonce before processing requests
-
Check for unsanitized output in stored dataReview plugin code that displays or stores data (such as listing fields, user inputs, or admin-entered content). Look for use of escaping functions like esc_html, esc_attr, or sanitize_text_field when handling outputAffected if User-supplied or stored data is output without proper sanitization, enabling stored XSS
Your environment is affected if the Listings for Buildium plugin is installed at version 0.1.5 or lower AND the plugin lacks anti-CSRF token validation on forms/AJAX actions AND fails to sanitize/escape output data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations (forms, AJAX endpoints, admin actions) within the plugin and validate these tokens server-side before processing any requests.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32606 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32606 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data