CVE-2025-32607
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in magepeopleteam WpBookingly service-booking-manager allows Object Injection.This issue affects WpBookingly: from n/a through <= 1.3.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA deserialization vulnerability in the WpBookingly WordPress plugin (versions up to 1.3.0) allows unauthenticated attackers to inject PHP objects via untrusted data processed through PHP's unserialize() function, potentially leading to remote code execution through magic methods or known gadget chains.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WpBookingly plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and verify WpBookingly appears in the installed plugins list, or inspect the directory wp-content/plugins/ for a folder named wpbookinglyAffected if The plugin is not installed or not present on the system
-
Check the installed version of WpBookinglyView the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/wpbookingly/wpbookingly.php or check the version field in the WordPress plugin admin page. Compare the version number to the affected range (1.3.0 and below)Affected if The installed version is 1.3.0 or any version up to 1.3.0 (e.g., 1.2.9, 1.2.0, 1.0.0)
-
Locate the vulnerable unserialize() callSearch the plugin source code for instances of unserialize() by examining PHP files in wp-content/plugins/wpbookingly/. Look for unserialize() being called on input from $_POST, $_GET, $_REQUEST, or other superglobals without prior sanitizationAffected if The plugin code contains an unserialize() call processing untrusted request data without validation
-
Verify the affected endpoint is accessibleIdentify if there is a publicly accessible WordPress AJAX endpoint (typically /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php) or other route that triggers the vulnerable unserialize() call. Test if the endpoint responds without authenticationAffected if The plugin exposes a route that calls the vulnerable unserialize() function to unauthenticated users
You are affected if WpBookingly plugin is installed with version 1.3.0 or lower, contains an unserialize() call on untrusted input, and that code path is reachable by unauthenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace unsafe unserialize() calls with json_decode() or other safe serialization methods, implement strict allowlist validation on any deserialized input, and update to the latest patched version when available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32607 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32607 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data