CVE-2025-32610
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FolioVision Foliopress WYSIWYG foliopress-wysiwyg allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Foliopress WYSIWYG: from n/a through <= 2.6.18.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FolioVision Foliopress WYSIWYG plugin allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unwanted state-changing actions. The CVSS 7.1 score indicates the potential for significant impact on user data or plugin functionality through malicious requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Foliopress WYSIWYG plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins. Locate 'Foliopress WYSIWYG' in the installed plugins list and note its activation status.Affected if The plugin is installed and active, exposing state-changing functionality to CSRF attacks.
-
Determine installed plugin versionIn the Plugins list, click on the plugin to view its details. Note the version number displayed. Compare your version against any known fixed version releases from the vendor.Affected if Your version is older than the patched version, if a patch has been released.
-
Inspect plugin for nonce implementationAccess the plugin files via FTP or file manager. Examine PHP files handling form submissions or state-changing actions (typically in the main plugin file or handlers). Search for 'wp_verify_nonce', 'nonce_field', or 'wp_create_nonce' function calls.Affected if No nonce verification is found before processing state-changing operations, leaving them vulnerable to CSRF.
-
Check AJAX endpoints for CSRF protectionReview plugin PHP files for admin-ajax.php or admin-post.php hooks. Verify that $_REQUEST['nonce'] or $_POST['nonce'] is validated with wp_verify_nonce before any data modification occurs.Affected if AJAX actions lack nonce validation, allowing attackers to forge requests on behalf of authenticated administrators.
-
Examine plugin forms for token fieldsView page source of any admin pages rendered by the plugin. Look for hidden input fields containing '_wpnonce' or similar token values in all forms that perform state changes.Affected if Forms lack CSRF token fields, enabling maliciously crafted form submissions from other sites.
You are affected if the Foliopress WYSIWYG plugin is active and its version lacks the CSRF fix, or if inspection reveals missing nonce verification on state-changing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available vendor patch/upgrade to latest version of Foliopress WYSIWYG. If no patch exists, implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations within the plugin.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32610 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32610 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data