CVE-2025-32686
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in WPSpeedo Team Members wps-team allows Object Injection.This issue affects Team Members: from n/a through <= 3.4.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WPSpeedo Team Members WordPress plugin (version <= 3.4.4) contains a deserialization vulnerability where untrusted input is passed to PHP's unserialize() function, allowing authenticated attackers to inject malicious PHP objects. This object injection can potentially lead to remote code execution if suitable magic methods exist in the plugin or other installed plugins/themes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the wps-team plugin is installedCheck your WordPress plugins directory for a folder named 'wps-team', 'wpspeedo-team-members', or similar, and confirm the plugin files exist in wp-content/plugins/Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory
-
Check the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file or readme.txt in the plugin folder and locate the version number; compare it to 3.4.4 or lowerAffected if The reported version is 3.4.4 or any version lower than 3.4.4
-
Identify unsafe unserialize() calls in plugin codeSearch all PHP files in the plugin folder for the pattern 'unserialize(' using grep, a code search tool, or manual inspectionAffected if Any PHP file in the plugin contains unserialize() calls that process input
-
Confirm user input reaches unserialize()Trace the code path from any found unserialize() calls backward to determine if $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST, or similar user-supplied data is passed as the argumentAffected if User-controllable data from HTTP request parameters flows directly to the unserialize() function
You are affected if the wps-team plugin is installed with version 3.4.4 or lower and contains unserialize() calls that process unauthenticated user input from HTTP requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest version of the Team Members plugin if a patched release is available; otherwise, disable or remove the plugin until a fix is released.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32686 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32686 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data