SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-32687

HIGH · 8.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
91/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Magnigenie Review Stars Count For WooCommerce review-stars-count-for-woocommerce allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Review Stars Count For WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 2.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL Injection vulnerability in the Review Stars Count For WooCommerce plugin allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input in review-related functionality. The vulnerability affects all versions through 2.0 and can be exploited to read, modify, or delete database content.

MitigationUpdate the Review Stars Count For WooCommerce plugin to the latest version once available, or implement input sanitization/parameterized queries in the plugin code to neutralize SQL special characters before database queries.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the Review Stars Count For WooCommerce plugin
    Check your WordPress installation's wp-content/plugins directory for a folder named 'review-stars-count-for-woocommerce' or similar variant. In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for this plugin.
    Affected if The plugin folder or entry exists in the plugins directory
  2. Identify the installed version
    In WordPress admin, find the plugin in Plugins > Installed Plugins and note the version number displayed. Alternatively, check the main plugin PHP file (usually review-stars-count-for-woocommerce.php) for a 'Version:' header in the plugin comment block.
    Affected if The version is 2.0 or lower (the vulnerability affects all versions through 2.0)
  3. Verify review functionality is active
    Check if WooCommerce is installed and the Review Stars Count plugin settings are enabled. Look for any review star display features or review count functionality that may be rendering on the site.
    Affected if WooCommerce reviews are enabled and the plugin is actively displaying review stars or counts on product pages
  4. Inspect the vulnerable review-related code
    Examine the main plugin PHP file for SQL queries that handle review data. Look for direct database queries using $wpdb->prepare or similar functions where review IDs, product IDs, or user input flows into the query without proper sanitization. Search for terms like 'get_comments', 'review', 'star', 'rating' in the code.
    Affected if SQL queries in the plugin code accept user-supplied review parameters without using parameterized queries or proper escaping

You are affected if the Review Stars Count For WooCommerce plugin is installed with version 2.0 or lower and review-related features are active on the site.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the Review Stars Count For WooCommerce plugin to the latest version once available, or implement input sanitization/parameterized queries in the plugin code to neutralize SQL special characters before database queries.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32687 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32687 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data