CVE-2025-32725
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedProtection mechanism failure in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA protection mechanism failure in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service, potentially disrupting IP address assignment across the network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.8148< 10.0.17763.7434< 10.0.20348.3745< 10.0.25398.1665< 10.0.26100.4270CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows Server versionRun 'winver' or execute 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object WindowsVersion, OsVersion, OsBuildNumber' in PowerShell to obtain the build numberAffected if The build number is less than one of these thresholds: 14393.8148 (Server 2016), 17763.7434 (Server 2019), 20348.3745 (Server 2022), 25398.1665 (Server 2022 23h2), or 26100.4270 (Server 2025)
-
Verify DHCP Server role is installedRun 'Get-WindowsFeature -Name DHCP' in PowerShell (Server 2016/2019) or 'Get-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName DHCP' in PowerShell (Server 2022+)Affected if The DHCP Server role shows as Installed or the feature state is Enabled
-
Confirm DHCP Server service is runningRun 'Get-Service -Name DHCPServer' in PowerShell and check the Status propertyAffected if The service exists and shows a status of Running (vulnerable attack surface is active)
-
Cross-reference build number with affected version listCompare your identified build number manually against the version thresholds listed in the CVE affected productsAffected if Your installed Windows Server version falls below any of the specified build numbers for your Server version
You are affected if your Windows Server version is below the threshold for your specific Server release AND the DHCP Server role is installed and running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.814810.0.17763.743410.0.20348.3745
Apply the latest Windows security updates to affected DHCP Server systems and monitor for anomalous DHCP traffic patterns.
Upgrade to Windows Server build 10.0.14393.8148 or higher (Server 2016); 10.0.17763.7434 or higher (Server 2019); 10.0.20348.3745 or higher (Server 2022); 10.0.25398.1665 or higher (Server 2022 23h2); 10.0.26100.4270 or higher (Server 2025)
- Identify the current Windows Server version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which Windows Server version is affected from: Server 2016 (build <10.0.14393.8148), Server 2019 (build <10.0.17763.7434), Server 2022 (build <10.0.20348.3745), Server 2022 23h2 (build <10.0.25398.1665), or Server 2025 (build <10.0.26100.4270)
- Open Windows Update: Start > Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' and wait for available security updates to appear
- Install all pending security updates, specifically those labeled for DHCP Server vulnerability CVE-2025-32725
- Restart the server if prompted after updates complete
- Verify the fix by checking the build version matches or exceeds: 10.0.14393.8148 (Server 2016), 10.0.17763.7434 (Server 2019), 10.0.20348.3745 (Server 2022), 10.0.25398.1665 (Server 2022 23h2), or 10.0.26100.4270 (Server 2025)
- Confirm DHCP Server service is running: Open Services console, locate 'DHCP Server', ensure Status is 'Running'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32725 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32725 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data