CVE-2025-32781
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApollo is a reliable configuration management system suitable for microservice configuration management scenarios. Prior to 2.5.0, Apollo Portal does not verify application and namespace permissions when an authenticated user requests a release by ID through GET /envs/{env}/releases/{releaseId} while configView.memberOnly.envs is enabled, allowing a low-privileged Portal user who obtains or guesses a valid releaseId to read configuration data from other applications and namespaces without calling UserPermissionValidator.shouldHideConfigToCurrentUser(...). This issue is fixed in version 2.5.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApollo Portal versions prior to 2.5.0 have an IDOR vulnerability where the GET /envs/{env}/releases/{releaseId} endpoint does not perform application and namespace permission checks when configView.memberOnly.envs is enabled. An authenticated low-privileged user who obtains or guesses a valid releaseId can bypass UserPermissionValidator.shouldHideConfigToCurrentUser(...) and read configuration data from other applications and namespaces.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apollo Portal versionLocate the Apollo Portal version number in the application UI (typically in About or Settings page) or check the build artifact/version file shipped with your installationAffected if version is prior to 2.5.0 (any 2.x.x version below 2.5.0)
-
Locate the Apollo configuration fileFind the application.properties or application.yml file used by your Apollo Portal deployment - typically in the config directory or classpathAffected if the configuration file exists and is accessible for inspection
-
Check if memberOnly.envs is enabledSearch for the configuration key 'configView.memberOnly.envs' in the Apollo Portal configuration file and note its value - this setting controls whether certain environments restrict access to members onlyAffected if configView.memberOnly.envs is set to a non-empty value (any environment name) that enables the vulnerable behavior
-
Verify endpoint accessibility for low-privilege usersUsing a low-privileged user account (non-admin), attempt a GET request to /envs/{env}/releases/{releaseId} using a releaseId from another application or namespace to confirm the IDOR vulnerability existsAffected if the request returns configuration data from other applications/namespaces without proper permission denial
-
Review user role and permissionsConfirm the test user has limited role permissions (not admin) and is authenticated but lacks application/namespace access rights for the target releaseAffected if the low-privileged authenticated user can access releases outside their authorized applications/namespaces
You are affected if Apollo Portal is version 2.5.0 or earlier, configView.memberOnly.envs is enabled, and a low-privileged authenticated user can read release configurations from applications/namespaces they are not authorized to access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Apollo Portal to version 2.5.0 or later which includes the missing permission validation. Alternatively, if upgrading is not immediately possible, disable the configView.memberOnly.envs configuration or implement compensating controls such as strict access logging on the releases endpoint.
2.5.0
- Backup your current Apollo Portal configuration and database
- Download Apollo version 2.5.0 from the official releases (github.com/ctripcorp/apollo/releases)
- Stop the running Apollo Portal service
- Upgrade the Apollo Portal to version 2.5.0 following the standard upgrade documentation
- Start the upgraded Apollo Portal service
- Verify that the authorization bypass is fixed by testing that low-privileged users cannot access release data via releaseId without proper permissions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32781 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32781 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data