CVE-2025-32878
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on COROS PACE 3 devices through 3.0808.0. It implements a function to connect the watch to a WLAN. This function is mainly for downloading firmware files. Before downloading firmware files, the watch requests some information about the firmware via HTTPS from the back-end API. However, the X.509 server certificate within the TLS handshake is not validated by the device. This allows an attacker within an active machine-in-the-middle position, using a TLS proxy and a self-signed certificate, to eavesdrop and manipulate the HTTPS communication. This could be abused, for example, for stealing the API access token of the assigned user account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe COROS PACE 3 smartwatch fails to validate X.509 server certificates during HTTPS requests when checking for firmware updates via WLAN. This allows a man-in-the-middle attacker with network proximity to intercept, eavesdrop, and manipulate HTTPS traffic using a self-signed certificate, potentially stealing user API access tokens.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.0808.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelCheck if the device is a COROS PACE 3 smartwatch. Look at the device itself or check the device settings for model information.Affected if Device is not a COROS Pace 3, the vulnerability does not apply.
-
Check installed firmware versionOn the COROS Pace 3, navigate to Settings > System > About > Version to view the firmware version number.Affected if Firmware version is 3.0808.0 or lower, indicating the device is affected.
-
Verify WLAN firmware update featureCheck if WLAN connectivity is enabled on the device. Navigate to Settings > WLAN or Settings > Connections > WLAN on the watch.Affected if WLAN is enabled and configured for firmware updates, the device is vulnerable when connected to untrusted networks.
-
Assess network exposureDetermine if the watch has connected or could connect to WLAN networks that are not fully trusted (public WiFi, shared networks, networks with unknown users).Affected if The device connects to WLAN networks where a man-in-the-middle attack is possible, the certificate validation flaw can be exploited.
If the device is a COROS Pace 3 with firmware version 3.0808.0 or lower and has WLAN enabled for firmware updates, the device is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedAvoid connecting the device to untrusted WLAN networks until COROS releases a firmware update that properly validates TLS server certificates. Treat the device as untrusted on any network where an attacker could position themselves between the watch and the firmware API.
Firmware version > 3.0808.0 (check support.coros.com for the specific latest fixed release)
- Check the current firmware version on your Coros Pace 3 by opening the Coros app, selecting your device, and viewing the firmware version under Settings > Device Info
- Visit the official Coros support page at support.coros.com to check for available firmware updates
- If a firmware version newer than 3.0808.0 is available, connect your Coros Pace 3 to the charging cable and ensure the device has sufficient battery (above 50%)
- Open the Coros app and initiate the firmware update process from the device settings
- Allow the firmware update to complete fully without disconnecting the device from power and the app
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32878 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32878 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data