CVE-2025-32888
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on goTenna Mesh devices with app 5.5.3 and firmware 1.1.12. The verification token used for sending SMS through a goTenna server is hardcoded in the app.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe goTenna Mesh mobile application (version 5.5.3) contains a hardcoded verification token used for SMS routing through goTenna's servers. This hardcoded credential allows anyone who discovers it to bypass authentication and send SMS messages through the service, potentially impersonating legitimate users or consuming service resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1.12= 5.5.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check mobile application versionOpen the goTenna Mesh app on your device, navigate to Settings > About or App Info, and locate the version number displayedAffected if The version shown is exactly 5.5.3 (the affected version)
-
Check goTenna Mesh firmware versionConnect your goTenna Mesh device to the mobile app, then go to Settings > Device Info or similar menu to view the firmware versionAffected if The firmware version displayed is exactly 1.1.12 (the affected version)
-
Verify if SMS routing is configuredIn the goTenna Mesh app, check Settings > SMS or Messaging settings to see if SMS relay or SMS routing through goTenna servers is enabledAffected if SMS routing through goTenna servers is turned on and the app/firmware version matches the affected versions listed above
-
Inspect network traffic for the hardcoded tokenUse a network proxy tool (such as Burp Suite or mitmproxy) to intercept traffic between the goTenna app and goTenna servers while sending an SMS; look for a static token value in the request headers or bodyAffected if A hardcoded, static token value appears consistently in SMS-related API requests
You are affected if your goTenna Mesh firmware is version 1.1.12 or your mobile app is version 5.5.3, and you have SMS routing through goTenna servers enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace the hardcoded verification token with a dynamic authentication mechanism such as per-session tokens, OAuth-based authentication, or a proper credential management system. Rotate any exposed tokens immediately.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32888 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32888 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data