CVE-2025-32910
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in libsoup, where soup_auth_digest_authenticate() is vulnerable to a NULL pointer dereference. This issue may cause the libsoup client to crash.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn libsoup, the soup_auth_digest_authenticate() function contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability. When processing digest authentication responses, certain conditions can lead to dereferencing a NULL pointer, causing the libsoup client to crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed libsoup versionRun 'pkg-config --modversion libsoup-3.0' or check your package manager (dpkg -l libsoup*, rpm -q libsoup, etc.)Affected if The version is unknown or within any affected range; compare to any vendor advisory
-
Confirm libsoup is in useSearch application dependencies (requirements.txt, package.json, Makefile, or ldd/objdump on binaries) for libsoup linkageAffected if libsoup is linked and digest authentication may be used for HTTP client functionality
-
Check for digest authentication usageReview application code for soup_auth_digest_new() calls or HTTP requests using Digest authentication headersAffected if The application makes HTTP requests that could trigger digest authentication flow
-
Inspect crash logs for NULL dereferenceCheck application logs, core dumps, or stderr for crashes mentioning 'soup_auth_digest_authenticate' or NULL pointer errors during authAffected if Crashes occur during authentication handshake with digest method
You are affected if libsoup is installed, your application uses digest authentication, and crashes occur in soup_auth_digest_authenticate() or NULL pointer errors appear during auth processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIf a patch is available, upgrade libsoup to the fixed version. Otherwise, implement NULL pointer checks in soup_auth_digest_authenticate() before dereferencing any pointers, particularly when handling authentication header parsing.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32910 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32910 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data