CVE-2025-32932
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiSOAR version 7.6.1 and below, version 7.5.1 and below, 7.4 all versions, 7.3 all versions, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions WEB UI may allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform an XSS attack via stored malicious service requests
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in FortiSOAR's web UI allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through service requests. The malicious payload persists in the system and executes when other users view the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.5.2>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiSOAR installationLocate the FortiSOAR application in your environment. This is typically a web-based application running on a dedicated server or virtual appliance. Check for the FortiSOAR web interface by accessing the URL (commonly https://<hostname>/fras/ or the configured endpoint).Affected if FortiSOAR web UI is accessible and running in your environment.
-
Check installed FortiSOAR versionLog into the FortiSOAR web UI as an administrator. Navigate to the Settings or System Configuration section, typically found under the user profile or admin menu. Locate the version information typically displayed as 'Version' or 'About' which shows the full version number.Affected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: 6.4.0 through 7.5.1, or 7.6.0 through 7.6.1.
-
Verify web UI service request module is enabledIn the FortiSOAR administration panel, navigate to the module configuration or playbooks/settings area. Look for the 'Service Requests' or 'SRTasking' module settings. Confirm this module is listed as active or enabled in the system configuration.Affected if The Service Request (SRTasking) module is enabled and accessible to authenticated users in the web UI.
-
Inspect service request records for suspicious contentAccess the Service Requests or SRTasking section in the FortiSOAR web UI as an administrator. Browse through existing service request records, particularly in text fields such as name, description, or request parameters. Look for unusual characters, HTML tags, or JavaScript code patterns like <script>, javascript:, onload, or other scriptable elements.Affected if Service request records contain unsanitized HTML, script tags, or JavaScript code in input fields that would execute when viewed by other users.
You are affected if FortiSOAR with a version in 6.4.0 to 7.5.1 or 7.6.0 to 7.6.1 is running, the web UI service request module is enabled, and service request fields contain unescaped malicious scripts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.27.6.2
Upgrade FortiSOAR to the patched version (7.6.2 or later). Until upgrade, implement output encoding and input validation on all service request fields in the web UI.
FortiSOAR 7.5.2 or later (7.5.x branch); FortiSOAR 7.6.2 or later (7.6.x branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiSOAR version by navigating to the FortiSOAR UI dashboard or checking the system information.
- 2. If running version 7.5.x (6.4.0 <= version < 7.5.2): Plan an upgrade to version 7.5.2 or later in the 7.5 branch.
- 3. If running version 7.6.0 or 7.6.1: Plan an upgrade to version 7.6.2 or later in the 7.6 branch.
- 4. Before upgrading, backup the FortiSOAR database and configuration following standard backup procedures.
- 5. Review FortiSOAR upgrade documentation for your specific version jump to ensure compatibility.
- 6. Perform the upgrade during a planned maintenance window to minimize business impact.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the FortiSOAR version reflects the patched release (7.5.2+ or 7.6.2+).
- 8. Test that the web UI functions correctly post-upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32932 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32932 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data