CVE-2025-32990
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heap-buffer-overflow (off-by-one) flaw was found in the GnuTLS software in the template parsing logic within the certtool utility. When it reads certain settings from a template file, it allows an attacker to cause an out-of-bounds (OOB) NULL pointer write, resulting in memory corruption and a denial-of-service (DoS) that could potentially crash the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap buffer overflow (off-by-one) in GnuTLS certtool template parsing logic allows an attacker controlling template file content to write a NULL pointer out-of-bounds, causing memory corruption and potential system crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 6.0= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0= 10.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify GnuTLS certtool is installedRun 'which certtool' or 'rpm -q gnutls-utils' (RHEL) to locate the certtool binaryAffected if certtool binary exists on the system
-
Confirm GnuTLS versionRun 'certtool --version' or 'gnutls-cli --version' to get the installed GnuTLS version numberAffected if The installed version falls within Red Hat EL 6.0-10.0 or is any version of GnuTLS (as all versions are affected)
-
Identify template file usageSearch for .template files in use, check for 'certtool --template' or '--load-template' arguments in scripts, cron jobs, or configuration filesAffected if Template files are processed by certtool, enabling the vulnerable parsing code path
-
Check for certtool crash logsReview system logs (/var/log/messages, journalctl, or audit logs) for certtool segfaults, abort signals, or heap-corruption errorsAffected if Recent crashes or memory corruption indicators appear in certtool process history
A user is affected if GnuTLS certtool is installed AND template file processing is in use, regardless of version since all versions are vulnerable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate GnuTLS to the patched version when released; avoid using untrusted or externally-sourced template files with certtool until patched.
Latest available GnuTLS version in your RHEL repository (see 'dnf info gnutls' or 'yum info gnutls')
- Update the GnuTLS package using your system's package manager: 'sudo dnf update gnutls' (RHEL 8/9) or 'sudo yum update gnutls' (RHEL 7)
- For RHEL 7, use 'sudo yum update gnutls'
- After updating, verify the new GnuTLS version with 'gnutls-cli --version'
- Restart any services that use GnuTLS (such as web servers, SSH daemons, or container runtimes) to ensure the updated library is loaded
- Test that the certtool utility functions correctly with 'certtool --version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-32990 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-32990 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data