CVE-2025-33092
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Db2 for Linux 12.1.0, 12.1.1, and 12.1.2 is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow in db2fm, caused by improper bounds checking. A local user could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Db2 for Linux versions 12.1.0, 12.1.1, and 12.1.2 contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the db2fm (Db2 Fault Monitor) component due to improper bounds checking. A local authenticated user can exploit this to overflow the stack buffer and execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1.0= 12.1.1= 12.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Db2 versionRun 'db2pd -version' or 'db2level' command as the Db2 instance owner to retrieve the installed Db2 version numberAffected if The version displayed is 12.1.0, 12.1.1, or 12.1.2 specifically
-
Verify db2fm component presenceCheck if the db2fm (Db2 Fault Monitor) binary exists on the system, typically in the Db2 installation bin directory (for example, ls -la /opt/ibm/db2/V12.1/bin/db2fm or similar path under your Db2 installation)Affected if The db2fm binary is present and executable on the system
-
Check db2fm service statusRun 'db2fm -s' or 'db2fm -L' as the Db2 instance owner to check if the Fault Monitor service is running or configuredAffected if The db2fm service is active, running, or enabled on the host
-
Confirm Db2 installation on LinuxQuery the system package manager (rpm -qa | grep -i db2 or dpkg --list | grep -i db2) or check for Db2 installation directories under /opt/ibm/Affected if IBM Db2 version 12.1.0, 12.1.1, or 12.1.2 is installed on a Linux system
You are affected if IBM Db2 version 12.1.0, 12.1.1, or 12.1.2 is installed on Linux and the db2fm (Db2 Fault Monitor) component is present and accessible on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM's security patch for this vulnerability. Refer to IBM's official security bulletin for the corrected Db2 version and follow the standard Db2 maintenance update procedure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-33092 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-33092 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data