CVE-2025-33103
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM i 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 product IBM TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities for i contains a privilege escalation vulnerability. A malicious actor with command line access to the host operating system can elevate privileges to gain root access to the host operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities for i contains a privilege escalation vulnerability allowing a malicious actor with command line access to the host operating system to elevate privileges to root. The vulnerability exists in the IBM i versions 7.2 through 7.6.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.2= 7.3= 7.4= 7.5= 7.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify IBM i versionRun command 'DSPSYSVAL SYSVAL(QSYSDSTS)' or use 'WRKSYSVAL SYSVAL(QSYSDSTS)' to display system value, or check 'DSPOPT' for OS version. Alternatively, use 'WRKCFGSTS' and look for IBM i version in system information.Affected if The displayed version is 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, or 7.6 (any version within the 7.2-7.6 range).
-
Confirm TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities for i is installedUse the command 'GO LICPGM' (License Program) and look for product 5733TCU (TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities) in the installed programs list, or run 'DSPLICPGM LICPGM(5733TCU)' if known to be installed.Affected if The product 5733TCU (TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities for i) appears in the installed license program list.
-
Check for command-line access exposureReview user profiles with special authority (*ALLOBJ, *SECADM) using 'WRKUSRPRF USRPRF(*ALL)' and examine system value QLMTSECA for restrictions. Check for users with access to PASE or QSH/QP2TERM.Affected if Multiple users or unrestricted profiles exist with command-line access (PASE, QSH, or QP2TERM) beyond trusted administrative personnel.
-
Review TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities components in useCheck for active TCP/IP connectivity utilities by reviewing IFS directories in /QIBM/ProdData/ and examining any user-defined applications that invoke utilities from this product.Affected if TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities executables or scripts in the product data directories are present and accessible to non-root users.
You are affected if your IBM i system runs version 7.2 through 7.6 AND has TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities for i installed with command-line access available to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply IBM's security patches for the TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities for i to address the privilege escalation vulnerability. Restrict command line access to trusted personnel as an additional compensating control.
IBM i 7.6 or apply IBM PTF for TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities for i (contact IBM support for specific PTF number)
- 1. Identify the current IBM i version by running 'DSPSFWRSC' or 'GO CMDPRTWTR' and checking the operating system release
- 2. Contact IBM support or access the IBM i PTF database to obtain the specific PTF (Program Temporary Fix) for IBM TCP/IP Connectivity Utilities for i that addresses CVE-2025-33103
- 3. Request and download the appropriate PTF for your specific IBM i version (7.2, 7.3, 7.4, or 7.5)
- 4. Apply the PTF using the 'LOADPTF' command or through System Service Tools (SST) / Dedicated Service Tools (DST)
- 5. After applying the PTF, verify the fix by checking the PTF status with 'DSPPTF' command and confirming the PTF is applied
- 6. If available, consider upgrading to IBM i 7.6 which may include the security fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-33103 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-33103 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data