CVE-2025-33104
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM WebSphere Application Server versions 8.5 and 9.0 contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI. Attackers can inject arbitrary JavaScript code through user input fields, which then executes in the browsers of other users viewing the affected pages. This enables session hijacking and credentials disclosure within trusted sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.5, < 8.5.5.28>= 9.0, < 9.0.5.24CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed WebSphere Application Server versionRun the versionInfo command from the bin directory: ./versionInfo.sh (Unix) or versionInfo.bat (Windows). Alternatively, check the registry.xml file in the properties directory.Affected if The reported version is 8.5.x where x < 28, or 9.0.x where x < 24, or any version between 8.5 and 9.0 that is not 8.5.5.28 or 9.0.5.24 exactly.
-
Confirm the Web UI administrative console is accessibleAccess the WebSphere admin console by navigating to the default HTTPS port (usually 9043 or 9443) on the server hostname, for example: https://hostname:9043/ibm/console. Verify the login page loads successfully.Affected if The admin console is reachable and accepts user credentials.
-
Verify user input fields exist in the Web UILog into the admin console and navigate to sections that accept user-supplied data, such as JNDI lookups, resource environment provider entries, or custom properties. These are typical locations where unsanitized input could trigger the XSS.Affected if The Web UI contains input fields that accept arbitrary text and display it back without immediate encoding in the response pages.
A user is affected if their IBM WebSphere Application Server version is 8.5.x below 8.5.5.28 or 9.0.x below 9.0.5.24, and the Web UI is accessible with user input fields present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.5.289.0.5.24
Apply the official IBM patch for CVE-2025-33104 when available. In the interim, implement input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in the Web UI, and consider restricting administrative access to trusted IP ranges.
Upgrade to IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.28 (for v8.5) or 9.0.5.24 (for v9.0)
- 1. Review IBM WebSphere Application Server fix pack release notes for versions 8.5.5.28 and 9.0.5.24 to understand included security fixes and any known issues
- 2. Back up your current WebSphere Application Server configuration, deployments, and applications
- 3. Download the appropriate fix pack (8.5.5.28 for v8.5 installations, 9.0.5.24 for v9.0 installations) from IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral)
- 4. Stop all WebSphere Application Server processes in your environment
- 5. Install the fix pack using the IBM Installation Manager or Update Installer following IBM's standard procedures
- 6. Verify the fix pack installation was successful by checking the version via the deployment manager admin console or wsadmin command
- 7. Restart WebSphere Application Server processes
- 8. Test that the Web UI functions correctly and the XSS vulnerability is mitigated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-33104 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-33104 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data