Db2 Merge BackupApplication · Ibm

CVE-2025-33124

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM DB2 Merge Backup for Linux, UNIX and Windows 12.1.0.0 could allow an authenticated user to cause the program to crash due to the incorrect calculation of a buffer size.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM DB2 Merge Backup version 12.1.0.0 contains a buffer size miscalculation flaw that can be triggered by an authenticated user, causing the program to crash. This appears to be an integer overflow or incorrect bounds calculation when determining buffer allocation sizes during merge backup operations.

MitigationApply IBM's patch for CVE-2025-33124 when available. Until then, limit access to the DB2 Merge Backup functionality to only essential authenticated personnel and monitor for crashes.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Db2 Merge BackupApplication
Affected:= 12.1.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify DB2 installation and version
    Run 'db2level' or check the DB2 installation directory for version information. On Linux/Unix, look in /opt/ibm/db2/version and check the output for version 12.1.0.0.
    Affected if The installed DB2 version is exactly 12.1.0.0 (no patches applied).
  2. Verify merge backup component is present
    Check if the DB2 Merge Backup utility (db2mergebackup or similar) exists in the DB2 bin directory. On Linux/Unix, typically under /opt/ibm/db2/V12.1/bin/ and look for merge backup related executables.
    Affected if The merge backup component is installed on the system.
  3. Confirm merge backup is configured or in use
    Query DB2 system catalog tables or check DB2 configuration for any merge backup operations or schedules. Use 'db2 list history' or check for any stored procedures related to merge backup.
    Affected if Merge backup functionality has been configured, scheduled, or used previously on the database.
  4. Review crash or error logs for merge backup failures
    Examine DB2 diagnostic logs (db2diag.log) for any recent crashes or errors related to merge backup operations, particularly those indicating buffer allocation or memory issues.
    Affected if There are recent crash logs or errors tied to merge backup operations in the DB2 diagnostic files.
  5. Check authenticated user access to merge backup
    Review DB2 permissions and user privileges for any accounts that have access to merge backup functions. Use 'db2get auth' or examine DB2 privileges granted to user groups.
    Affected if Multiple authenticated users or any non-essential accounts have privileges to execute merge backup operations.

A system is affected if it runs IBM DB2 version 12.1.0.0 with the merge backup component installed and accessible to authenticated users, especially if merge backup has been used or configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM's patch for CVE-2025-33124 when available. Until then, limit access to the DB2 Merge Backup functionality to only essential authenticated personnel and monitor for crashes.

Fix this in Db2 Merge Backup Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-33124 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-33124 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data