CVE-2025-3361
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe web service of iSherlock from HGiga has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceiSherlock from HGiga contains an OS Command Injection vulnerability in its web service component. Unauthenticated remote attackers can inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying server through vulnerable input fields or parameters in the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify iSherlock installationLocate iSherlock installation directories, running services, or processes on the system. Check common installation paths or use system inventory tools to find HGiga iSherlock components.Affected if iSherlock from HGiga is present on the system and the web service component is running.
-
Determine installed versionRetrieve the version of the installed iSherlock instance. Check version files, executable metadata, or use any available version query command provided by the product. Compare the version against any documented versions from HGiga.Affected if The installed version falls within the affected version range (if known) or cannot be determined to be patched.
-
Verify web service is enabledCheck if the iSherlock web service component is running and listening on network ports. Review service configuration and ensure the web interface is accessible.Affected if The web service component is enabled and accessible, exposing the vulnerable input fields.
-
Inspect exposed web interface parametersReview the iSherlock web application configuration and identify user-supplied input fields or parameters that could accept OS command input. Examine form inputs, query parameters, or API endpoints in the web interface.Affected if The web interface contains input fields or parameters that are not properly validated and could accept shell commands.
If iSherlock from HGiga is installed with its web service component enabled and accessible, and the version is within the affected range or cannot be verified as patched, the environment is likely affected by this OS command injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization for all user-supplied parameters, preferably using allowlists. Replace any unsafe command execution methods with parameterized alternatives or safe API calls that do not involve shell interpretation.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3361 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3361 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data