CVE-2025-34057
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn information disclosure vulnerability exists in Ruijie NBR series routers (known to affect NBR2000G, NBR1300G, and NBR1000 models) via the /WEB_VMS/LEVEL15/ endpoint. By crafting a specific POST request with modified Cookie headers and specially formatted parameters, an unauthenticated attacker can retrieve administrative account credentials in plaintext. This flaw allows direct disclosure of sensitive user data due to improper authentication checks and insecure backend logic. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-02-05 UTC.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRuijie NBR series routers (NBR2000G, NBR1300G, NBR1000) contain an unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability in the /WEB_VMS/LEVEL15/ endpoint. By sending crafted POST requests with modified Cookie headers and specially formatted parameters, attackers can retrieve plaintext administrative credentials. The flaw stems from improper authentication checks and insecure backend logic. Active exploitation was observed in the wild on 2025-02-05.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router's web interface or CLI and retrieve the model number and firmware version. In the CLI, this is typically shown in the startup banner or via 'show version' or 'show system-info' commands. Alternatively, check the device label or physical documentation.Affected if The device is a Ruijie NBR2000G, NBR1300G, or NBR1000 series router.
-
Check firmware versionIn the router's web interface, navigate to System Status or Maintenance > Version. In CLI, use 'show version' or 'show firmware-version' if available. Compare the displayed version against any Ruijie firmware releases for these models.Affected if The firmware version is older than the latest Ruijie release that addresses this vulnerability.
-
Verify endpoint exposureFrom an external network location (or from a segment that simulates an external attacker), attempt an HTTP POST request to http://<device-ip>/WEB_VMS/LEVEL15/. Use a tool like curl: curl -X POST -d 'test' http://<device-ip>/WEB_VMS/LEVEL15/. If the endpoint responds (even with an error), it is reachable.Affected if The /WEB_VMS/LEVEL15/ endpoint is accessible from an untrusted network segment or the internet.
-
Inspect for credential-related anomaliesLog into the router's admin interface and review the administrator accounts under User Management or System Administration. Look for unexpected new accounts, accounts with elevated privileges, or password changes you did not initiate.Affected if Unexpected administrative accounts exist or recent credential modifications are found without legitimate admin action.
-
Review access logs for exploitation attemptsCheck the router's logs (System > Logs or CLI 'show logging') for POST requests to /WEB_VMS/LEVEL15/ with abnormal Cookie headers or parameters. Search for entries containing 'LEVEL15', unusual user-agent strings, or repeated authentication failures.Affected if Logs show POST requests to /WEB_VMS/LEVEL15/ with modified Cookie headers or requests that appear to target this endpoint from untrusted sources.
A user is affected if they operate a Ruijie NBR2000G, NBR1300G, or NBR1000 router with the vulnerable endpoint exposed to an untrusted network and running firmware without the CVE fix.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply network access controls to restrict or block external access to the /WEB_VMS/LEVEL15/ endpoint; contact Ruijie for firmware updates; if no patch available, consider network segmentation or replacement of affected devices.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34057 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34057 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data